|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:14 PM Original message |
Wes Clark is DEAD TO ME NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Automatically Makes Him A Hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. No doubt they feel really bad about the loss of you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Satire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. If this is satire, then it wasn't done as well as the other Olbermann thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Because it's more fact-based. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. No you used people who endorsed Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I had a bunch of links to threads, but I was advised to remove them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. This is how you do satire .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. satire requires some level of expertise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
62. And sometimes it requires a modicum of wit just to discern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
61. Ummm ... did you actually read the post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wes Clark is great just on the other side for a while... no biggie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfin
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. Just emotional as it sunk in, I am not going to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madaboutharry
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Whoopi Goldberg voted for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. No she didn't. She switched to Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madaboutharry
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. She voted for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. There is also videotape of Whoopi sttaing that she voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madaboutharry
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. O.K., I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wes Clark is a great American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. This thread has the stink of plagiarism, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buff2
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Fuck you and your Democratic hate mongering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Check your PM....pronto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. all very true - but on DU only Obama walks on water posts get appreciated by large numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Doesn't Hillary dot com have a blog where you can gush unimpeded by reality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'm sure Wes Clark is just sitting around worrying about what you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. It's satire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Roseanne is voting for Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. This would be funnier satire if most pro-Obama Clarkies weren't saying the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Yeah, that's the thing. It's the Clinton folks who are shunning liberal icons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. I haven't shunned anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Get a load of some of the stuff the Clinton people were saying about Randi Rhodes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. I don't condone any of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Oh, so sliming her isn't as bad then. Wilson and Clark are more "important". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. My point is that Randi has always had her detractors on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. That is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Oh, I see, that's the standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. A cursory glance at the headlines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Well, a "cursory glance at the headlines" doesn't let you see the comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. It's not calling him a drunkard and mocking him for a terrible accident either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Roseanne, Whoopi, Nicholson??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Excellent Point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. No, but they've been torn apart here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
56. That's what they call Argument from Authority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
45. Yet the OP just told me that Randi Rhodes is not a liberal icon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. No, I didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Well She Sure The Hell Should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Whoopi, Roseanne, and Jack Nicholson too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. No, not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. But, but, they're not Important Democratic Icons like Wilson and Clark so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. When did I EVER say it was okay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. And then pointed out that Randi was already disliked and wasn't as big an icon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. This thread: Change you can Xerox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. I don't think we can demand all good people think as we do? Clark was the likely VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
27. Copycat satire doesn't really work does it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
28. This post reminded me of that Fox News hit program The 30 minute News Hour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. Um, YAWN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
34. Good post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
37. Wonderful post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
38. Ann Richards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
40. So why do Barney Frank, George McGovern, and UFW Co-Founder Dolores Huerta deserve to live? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Ahh yes, you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
64. Hell no! Neocon shitweasels, the whole bunch of them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
43. Additional side note |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
47. Some DUers are really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
49. I respect all these people .... I disagree with their politics right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
50. Wes Clark was never all that alive to me in the first place... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
53. Don't forget about Larry Johnson. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
65. You forgot Maxine Waters. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
68. I never liked any of those ppl you listed except the Clintons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sat Mar-08-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
69. You used to respect rosanne barr? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
72. Not me. As a late-term Obama supporter, I wholly agree with Wes Clark's opinion ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:34 AM Response to Original message |
73. p.s. That's kind of a weak "dead to me" list. Jack Nicholson? Really? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC