|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:08 PM Original message |
PLEASE... Someone tell me why Hillary should be nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. I got nothin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
55. you head stilling worried about O. losing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Nah RD -- just can't come up with a compelling reason to nominate her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:11 PM Original message |
Because she is really good at domestic crisis bimbo management. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
75. so that's why she's supported Bush so often |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because I've always wanted to see Bush in a pantsuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:21 PM Original message |
spraying beer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
50. I really don't get why people continue to comment on the pantsuits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 05:47 AM Response to Reply #50 |
69. She should wear desert camo like the soldiers she helped send to Iraq. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 05:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
68. lol..not gonna touch that one! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. Um...don't you know. It's "her turn"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. YOU must be a NADER supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because she's inevitable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. Uh-Oh... looks like Hillary's thread is getting no love. C'mon people... we need reasons! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I gave every possible reason I could muster... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. If nothing else, she's a known quantity. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. One word: COMPETENCE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Like the competence of her campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Or her IWR vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
From The Left
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Don't Ask Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. So far, one word is all they got. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because Dems just have to keep nominating people who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. for the record.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Elsewhere, love your link. I just don't understand why anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. : ) agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Yup! ready from day before 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. Oh please, more B.S. from the Obama camp!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:32 PM Original message |
Apparently you can't think of one good reason why Clinton is prepared... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
From The Left
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 06:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
72. And they say Obamamania is irrational? HAHAHAHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. According to Wes Clark... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 05:53 AM Response to Reply #17 |
70. The "rear" admiral was there because she's so far "behind" in the race. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
18. So far we have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Obama is highly partisan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. This thread is your prime opportunity to talk about HRC, and all you people want... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I didn't bring him up, you did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. You're avoiding the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. A windy opinion piece with no links. I'm totally knocked out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #43 |
49. uh, usually when one has an opinion on something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Okay, if you want to change the subject to an offhand comment about Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #58 |
73. Friend? Is Sen. Feingold partisan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. I would dispute that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
19. Health Care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Um, more accurately it would be called health insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. Sorry. Can't think of a single reason. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
24. Children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. She's going to fix all those other things AND the children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. Energy Independence and Fighting Global Warming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. We have an answer!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Deleted message |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Ahhh, name calling. But still no reasons to nominate Sen. Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
29. Lowering taxes for middle class families. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
62. especially if you think somebody making $100,000 is middle class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
31. Sex Appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Ohhhh yeahhhh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
37. Obama always agrees with her.."I agree with Senator Clinton"...he never says anything else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. They just played that on SNL skit--it was hillarious!-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. aww damn I have my TV turned off...I'll have to wait and catch it on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. there were several duzzies of obama including his being now PRESENT for public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. omg LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. sorry i did not record----but many good for You-tube. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
45. If you can't figure it out that's your problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Ahhhh, got nothing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. And if Sen. Clinton's defenders can't be bothered to explain her value... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #48 |
61. why should we--all you obamababies do is mock her anyway. do your own homework |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 01:27 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Is that the phone bank script? "Hello, I'm calling from the Clinton campaign..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Sat Mar-01-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
47. uh huh HRC is gonna make that sam cooke song a reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. give this man a kewpie doll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 05:59 AM Response to Reply #47 |
71. only Sam Cooke song Hill's gonna sing is "There'll Be No Second Time". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyVT
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
53. Are you really asking? Okay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruiner4u
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
56. Pantsuits!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
63. She shouldn't - Senator Obama should. That said, unlike some HRC supporters I'll vote for WHOEVER is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
65. Are you too lazy to do some research? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 05:37 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. When I can have a thread full of zealots do it for me? No... that's not 'lazy'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
74. I thought of one - we get to call her by her first name, and we get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
76. she SHOULDN'T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
77. Because She's A Great Dem And Would Make A Great President, Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. So how exactly does that distinguish her from her primary opponent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
78. I don't think she should be. And neither should Obama. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
From The Left
![]() |
Sun Mar-02-08 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
80. As far as I know, she won't be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC