|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
carlotta (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:26 PM Original message |
Obama campaign won't deny Canada NAFTA contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not only has Obama deniied it, so has the Canadian gov't.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. link with that proof please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Try paying attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. The public affairs person denied... the ambassdor never did best I can tell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. Let's make up some stories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. the true Obama revealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Of course her campaign also contacted Canada to discuss NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. link some proof please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The same debunked story that suggested Obama did also mentioned Clinton doing so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. The Canadian government denied it. Let's try to find a new story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. LMAO. Pathetic. Here you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. TBM says "in recent days"....CTV said "last month" so TBM is a smoke&mirror for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Here. Try ABC's link, which makes it very clear he was referring to the CTV story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. From TPM: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. CTV says it was last month...TBM says "days"...try again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. You're really, really reaching here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Don't you ever grow tired of being so consistently wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. maybe it was just that Obama adviser didn't make the call but CONTACT between them HAS been ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Link to proof? Because I've linked to denials from both ends here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. What would you not believe that was against Obama, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. that he eats babies ;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I am sure you would believed it if Hillary told you to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libbygurl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. Thanks, carlotta! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Those Canadians, which have flatly denied the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. LOL! This thread is a DUzy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. This takes "talk to the hand" to a new level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
22. Snore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
25. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
29. Now you've done it, stirred the nest of BO cultists, you deserve the thrashing they will give you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Yes, the crazy cultists who are doing bizarre things like linking to news stories debunking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Not sure they know how to read. They can only post talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. "denials from Obama's campaign"! That's as useful as a piece of used toilet paper. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. no, dear. Denials from the Canadian Government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. I replied to #35 "denials from Obama's campaign". I see you have a problem reading. I'm so sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. I only mentioned it because the OP claims Obama's camp "refuses to deny" the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I replied to #35 that said "denials from Obama's campaign". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. And if you had actually bothered reading what I just wrote, you'd have seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. The denial from that spokesman was so tepid, easy to see he was parsing words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I replied to #35 that said "denials from Obama's campaign". Do you have trouble reading? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. No, but you might. The poster is ageeing with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. If you are correct, then I really am too tired. Mea culpa to anyone I offended. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. The poster is a big Clinton supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. No sweat GI. Thanks for setting me straight. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Cut down on your intake of politics. It works for me everytime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
55. ahhh we are the kool aid drinkers....now I have to get a new avatar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. Again, you demonstrate a shocking lack of reading comprehension. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
30. May be you need to stop watching you tube and start watching real news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. Looks like the Hill-bots got their latest batch of talking points, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. The Hilly Heathers couldn't get any stupider or more dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
36. Associated Press: Candian Embassy confirms story is not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. I was just going to post that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Thanks. I'm replying in hopes of being post 35 million. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. I didn't even realize that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
53. Not True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
46. We'd LOVE for NAFTA to be re-negociated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. good to hear you aren't to happy with it either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
54. THIS ENTIRE STORY IS FALSE, Multiple reports that it is false including MSNBC (Abrams show) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
58. Has Hillary denied she puts kittens on spikes yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
64. Uh oh -- if they won't deny it, it means they did it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Actually, they did deny it. So did the Canadian government. Read the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. More then likely there is some winking going on here...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
67. Bumping the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:34 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. No, it isn't. But no one blames you for trying. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Already debunked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC