|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:29 PM Original message |
Hey, Admins! Can we please make thread recommends public? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not a bad idea at all.........I agree, make them public nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. I confess, Maddy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
118. I rec'd this, but on second thought, what would it actually accomplish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. I like that idea myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. That'd be really interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyAnne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. While it would be entertaining, I think it would cause even more vitriol. The best thing we can do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Well, I think a lot of people would be less likely to rec a thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyAnne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
61. That's a great point. You've convinced me. People would be too ashamed to have their names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:25 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. You don't think some people recommend awful threads because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. There could be some of that. I bet most of it is the same handful of people going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
100. How about Iris scans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. It would encourage people not to send the worst of all that to the greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
57. Welcome to DU - from Emily Frances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
7. I second that -- excellent idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. They already are actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can a thread be hidden or removed from the greatest page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. I recommend this thread about recommended threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I commend you for recommending this thread about recommending threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I'd like to recommend this comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. I actually think this would be a very big hit on bandwith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. Rec. I saw a post the other night where a guy tried to rec twice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
99. Introducing the "DU Patriot ACT" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. You're kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Oh, well. We'll count you as against it then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
50. I don't agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:30 AM Response to Reply #50 |
64. Because you DON'T. Because what's "garbage" to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #18 |
68. Pay attention to which side is constantly recommending the "authoritarian bullshit" and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
73. It does seem authoritarian to me also. I think the over all effect would be that threads would get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Babel_17 (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
122. "I, for one, welcome our new Recommend Observing overlords" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Anti-Bush (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
129. Well, look who posted this one; a Hillary supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
19. Terrible idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
91. I agree, it works as an anonymous way to support a thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
20. I don't like that idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
21. Admins would HAVE to be able to see who recommends a thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
22. But how will I sow hate and discontent from my secret lair then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. I'd rather revisit the up/down vote for threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
25. I can answer that for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Evil bastards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
26. I may or may not have recommended this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
28. Great idea but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. But that'd kill the purpose of it. If you like a thread so much that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I wouldn't mind my name showing up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Some thread are going on the greatest page that shouldn't be there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. That's why I like the idea... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. Don't mind me... I'm slow. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #33 |
78. Bad idea. You don't use a chain saw to cut a birthday cake. I am sure there are better methods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. I guess you've never had a birthday cake that I baked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
85. "people should be careful what they recommend". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
29. I rather dislike the idea. It just sounds like something that would stir up hard feelings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
31. I'd like that, but also would love an unrecommend option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adams Wulff (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
83. How about a Reccommend button, and next to it, a Condemn Button? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #83 |
95. I could go for a condemn button. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
34. They can see how we vote in polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
35. Good idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. I'd be against members being allowed to ban members that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. LOL!! Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. You and I would have banned each other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. hahahaha! Now THAT is funny as all hell! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
37. I like this idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
40. I never write any OP for recommends nor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
41. Maybe some people recommend an obnoxious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
43. I think people should only be given 1 or 2 recommends a day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
44. rec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
45. Recommended! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
46. I have recommended threads wherein some of the responses are blazingly on target in rebuttal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
47. Excellent idea!!! k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
51. I like that idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
52. If there is a way to do it, I would like to see it. Don't know if there is a way to implement it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
53. That would be okey dokey with me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
55. The one thing I would recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
86. I think that is the best idea. 5 recs is way too low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
56. if they do this then we need the ability to un recc a thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
58. A big K/R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
59. I would guess they can. Since they can see how people vote in polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
60. Maddy, I'd go for that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
62. I Say We Should See The Same For Polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
motocicleta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
63. Pretty please, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 04:42 AM Response to Original message |
65. Errr Not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:46 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. The idea It does have its drawbacks-as you point out--but It does see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bongo Prophet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
67. You know what would REALLY be interesting? Turning on the "show IP adress" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
70. To prove what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
71. Becuz Obama "dems - in name only" can't get enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Bingo. We have a winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
75. And while you are posting the people who recommended the posts, could you also post everyones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
131. email addresses should also be included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
76. Just wondering Maddy, do you think the mods should also release the names, addresses and phone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Dramatic much? All they'll see is your public username |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #82 |
92. That is true now, but it seems like some would have it different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. No one in this thread -- who is this mysterious "some?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #76 |
87. It is just you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #87 |
93. If that be the case, that is fine by me. I don't need someone else to confirm what I already know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
102. Such was not my intention at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #102 |
107. No apology needed, I do the best to own my own feelings. I feel passionate about this type of thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Well put. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
77. recommended!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
79. Most people already make it public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
81. I recall them saying that they would be in the coming overhaul. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. I think they were talking about polls and making it public who votes which way in them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
84. I'm neutral on this idea, but I'm intrigued by your motivation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
88. It would be an intrusion on privacy which would change people's behavior. Not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
90. Agree. What fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurgedVoter (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
96. K&R better late than never. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
97. I bet we'd see that some of the same posters are rec'ing asinine hate threads for both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
98. I'm just not sure this is a really good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
101. What a stupid post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. Why is this post stupid? I just gave this the 48th recommendation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. Lets make public who is alerting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. I don't understand why someone would feel the need to recommend in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. What is the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #115 |
123. Well, I think it would help to determine who is disrupting personally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. I come here for my own enjoyment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. It think your 'executioner' comparison is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. The Upright Citizens Brigade would be a welcome change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
all.of.me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
103. Sounds catty to me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
104. I've always wondered if when we hit "recommend" DU could automatically register |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
105. Aren't they doing that in DU version 2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:31 PM Original message |
THIS is DU version 2. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurgedVoter (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
110. And post the time recommended! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
111. The Clintonites must know who DEFIES THE QUEEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Creideiki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
112. I'm not even looking for "entertainment". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noac7 (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
114. I support this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sadie5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Thanks maddy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissentIsPatriotic (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. I think everyone that posts at DU should be branded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not Sure (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
119. Why not? After all, if you don't do anything wrong.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirrera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
120. Are we in High School? Read it or don't... who cares!...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
121. I kick most of the threads I recommend. I have no problem with it. If you're endorsing something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
126. Strongly agree ... kicking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
127. I agree it would be a great idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
128. How can Skinner get good advice if it isn't kept confidential? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_dem (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
130. Not really needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
133. Informing, entertaining, and an easy Hit List... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZinZen (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
134. DKos does so. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
135. fine with me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
136. Yeah because what this board needs is more opportunity for negative energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
137. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Sep 24th 2024, 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC