|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:50 PM Original message |
UK Guardian: Hillary Clinton woos man who nearly ruined her husband (DRUDGE) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Someone has to teach Hillary about The Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Yes, she has proven to be very google deficient. She also needs gingko to remember pardons in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Yes, she's still Xeroxing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's called Ju-Jitsu. Use the enemy's power against him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
39. Just back away slowly, redqueen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bumping for more developements. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. and who reads Drudge? Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. the media reads drudge faithfully. It gets picked up by conservative radio and then the MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. well I'm a democrat and I don't read that shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. "To see Hillary Clinton use that scumbag's site as a tool is sickening to me" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. like to see that New York Times article - Clinton/Drudge connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Here's Wolfson's validating part of Drudge's claim: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. So... why no response from those who think anyone upset over the Drudge story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
47. *crickets* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. Another day, another low |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. DLC loyalty at its finest. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigAnth
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. Any comments from the Clinton people on this?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Good question. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. They are blaming Obama for everything! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. NY times article link anyone??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Here's a link to the NYT piece referred to in the article in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. TYVM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. De nada. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. EXCERPT - NYT Article >>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
48. You'd think they would have known we'd find the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. If this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. oooh - more Drudge! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. This is from the Guardian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. more RW crap on DU ---Obamafolks should be proud of themselves?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. The UK Guardian is RW crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
24. What a hoot---absolutely shows how DU made fools out of some many Obamafolk on DU today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. How does it show that? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. What, the Clinton's campaign has a relationship with him? Nice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. Hah! Today must be opposite day! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
27. So BIll had nothing to do with ruining himself? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
31. Oops! The British press is now onto Hillary's dirty tricks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. They've been onto her since October 23 2007. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Or the half of DU who's having apoplectic fits that anyone would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
42. Kick for more comments. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. You won't find a lot of comments from Hillaryland on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
43. Yuck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
44. And here's the Buzzflash on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Yep - the same NYT article that's posted above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Mon Feb-25-08 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
49. Well, there's a shocker. Not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Tue Feb-26-08 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
50. Denial is not a river in Egypt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Tue Feb-26-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
51. It must be true, cuz we saw the result of this, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC