|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
pampango
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:21 AM Original message |
Superdelegates, Back Off (NYT-Tad Devine) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. The party AGREED to the superdelegate system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. We've had these rules 40 years. Don't need to change them now so the whiners can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I haven't particularly liked the rules for 25 or so years they have been in effect, since I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Aren't Superdelegates just hand selected voters whose vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Deleted message |
neutron
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. An Opinion Does Not Reflect the NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Super Delegates are Dem Elected congress past & present, VP, Pres and DNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #17 |
40. They should not override the will of the electorate. I believe that if they do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. yeah, that is the big concern H. Dean wants a deal between the candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. All the SD's don't have to agree. At this time it appears that the SD pledges give Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Not So Much More |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. posted in wrong place sry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. And Where Does The Author Ask That The Rules Be Changed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Superdelegates weren't designed to "amplify the decision of The People.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. You Might Be Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Make that 26 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Do you want DNC members, governors, and past presidents, etc. substituting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NWHarkness
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Yeah, actually, I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. At least I can agree with your last sentence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. No, I don't. But we should have addressed this problem years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Mondale and Dukakis weren't winners so they were whiners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Well, not all Obama supporters want to change mid-stream... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Well, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Exactly!! BUT in Chicago when tables were turned .."by the rules" was HOW Obama wanted to play.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. We have had pages and pages of Obama people lecturing Hill people to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
51. That is so funny. Play by the rules when it suits him. When it doesn't suit him, change 'em! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
46. The party machine agree to the SD system so that they would have control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. contest of ideas and inspiration, where hope can battle with experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. Good article, Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
13. Obama's surrogates are in full force. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
47. This type of post is devisive and uncalled for. Whose side are you working for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 09:08 AM Response to Reply #47 |
54. The truth is that Obama is scared of the superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I appoligize for the reference to the terrible. I hate the name calling but catch myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
21. Link to another article about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. Want to see the Democratic Party tear itself apart? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. If he wins the majority of the delegates going into the convention, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Let me rephrase that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Winning the nomination isn't achieved by leading. The nomination is won by gaining a majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I am not arguing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I've always been opposed to super delegates, not that my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I'm not an Obama supporter, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Well, if you want to go with the "will of the people," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
31. Change is NEEDED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffersons Ghost
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. oops self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. The ONLY way I would support Primaries over Caucuses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #35 |
48. I have a couple of problems with your response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. "Why not let all the people vote in the primary?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I hate to belabor but.... You didn't answer my question, so I will rephrase it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #31 |
41. Closed primaries are not necessary in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #41 |
57. I agree you shouldn't have to check a box. I think you should register as a Democrat or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
49. Why of course! The Obama might LOSE if the rules are followed. Yes, let's change them now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. The "rules" do not have to be changed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
56. it ain't over until the fat lady delegates sing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC