|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:53 PM Original message |
Isn't anyone going to complain about SC being run by Diebold/ES&S? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. hehehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. No kidding. At least we won't have to worry about that tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm sure that HRC will be preparing an inquiry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I doubt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. I was waiting for that with glee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. The head of the SC Dem Party said they had had no problems reported. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Did you miss NH? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. But there were many complaints in NH, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. maybe obama folks are a bunch of complainers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaryninMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. That's because all of the exit are not in yet- NH was about discrepancies in exit polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. The exit polls were very close in New Hampshire to the actual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
39. Not a peep of sore loser mantras from the Hillary gang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. They don't care about counting votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. ha ha. only if they lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well the exit polls match the results in SC unlike NH, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The results aren't even out yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. With over 75% in I stand by my statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Sure you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Thanks, I was going to point that out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. ha ha you got that right. Rationality seems to be at an all time low here tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. So, at 10% of the precincts reporting, you were ready to declare the results accurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. No, actually I wasn't - that's why I posted the link to the actual results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Pardon me, but you didn't post any links in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. No, I started a thread, it sunk. I also posted it in another thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:02 PM Original message |
No, actually I posted that the results matched the exit polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. The next time you feel the urgent need to butt into a conversation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:03 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Um....ok then .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. no the winners only complain when they lose nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. They only complain when they're losing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. Don't see CNN or MSNBC showing the tally numbers from the various counties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. For anyone who actually gives a shit about the election, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Actually, that was my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Seems like it, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. The ER people are monitoring EVERY state, just as I'm doing in Tennessee. If there isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. There is no paper trail in SC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I'm just referring to the initial results, but good point. And thanks for the paper trail info. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
44. What are they counting? Vapor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. With good reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. ROFL.. good point, sfexpat :-) Voter Vapors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. there are no paper ballots used in SC. It's all paperless, hence any audit would be totally meaningl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. The exit polls matched in New Hampshire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisainmilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. not me! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. Were there massive discrepencies in the polling data? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. actually, yes; obama out-performed the polls. if the situation was reversed you KNOW the obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. You Should!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
29. The night is still young. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
30. No, it's only rigged if Obama loses. When Obama wins, it's the will of the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
31. I posted yesterday, where were you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Oh, sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I wish all Democratic candidates would call for a partial recount, just to push the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
34. No problems have been reported but I would love to know if any are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
48. We've been complaining since 2003! It's time for Hillary to complain! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
51. No, cuz their man won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. If she did, I'd be impressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC