|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:02 PM Original message |
If Clintons are willing to trash the DNC's rules, they're probably willing to trash the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Which "you guys" are you referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. And she will probably bomb the whole world, why wouldn't she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Interesting non sequitor. Now once again, which "you guys" are you referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. The Clinton haters, obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It was aimed at the OP. The poster seemed to assume something about the OP that might not be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. We see fifty threads just like this one every day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Why do you hate Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Logical fallacies 101 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Your irony-meter is broken I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Calmed down now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
98. Oh bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #98 |
140. And I see your irony meter is broken as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
99. Yeah? Who does Cying support then ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Obamites gone wild |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. The OP isn't an Obama supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
100. No shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
109. No no no they're series! This is hugh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Just because people will ask, are you the supporter of any one candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'm not an Obama supporter. Although he's apparently the only firewall left. He's the least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. So, Kucinich and Edwards are offensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. And which loyalties would those be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Edwards is a panderer whose Senate record will KILL him in the General and Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. They probably ignore the speed limit, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hey, I'm in Florida.. I am voting for purpose of only voting.. actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. At the least I don't know how they could seat Michigan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. They won't count - but asking the convention to vote on seating them is part of the rules and SOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:53 AM Response to Reply #28 |
134. They shouldn't even be seated.. if they are there.. its too tempting to count them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. DNC rules that disenfranchise Americans ARE unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The DNC is an ORGANIZATION THAT WRITES ITS OWN RULES. Damn some DU'ers are thick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. Is it against the rules to appeal them or to ask to change them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. Doesn't matter who wrote them. They violate the equal right to vote, among other things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. You guys need to take your questions and criticisms directly to the State Committees... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
61. Exactly! Anti-democratic and unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heywood J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
136. Did I miss the time when the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. The rules are subject to change, of course, and HRC is pursuing that possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Not in the middle of an election season, when the rules have already been written. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. If the rules are subject to change, they are subject to change. If the parties do not agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
103. I guess it's just OK with you for Obama to change them, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
139. I'm not sure of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. You don't change the rules mid-race. The time to change the rules is after this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. To the contrary: you follow the process, as laid out in the rules. If change mid-campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. You demean yourself. Tell me, is it against the rules to ask to change the rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kstewart33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes. And I said a curse word today in front of my kids.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. Just like Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. that's kind of a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulklogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
19. And then they'll club baby seals, BBQ the meat, and wear seal-fur undercrackers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
23. They're willing to do much worse than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
36. I don't agree that that's a logical statement... but I do think all the candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
37. Yup, constitution and the rules of the DNC...same thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
38. Yup, constitution and the rules of the DNC...same thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Also: HRC isn't breaking the rules. She's asking to change them. Same happens with the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. She's asking to change them AFTER she's seized the delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Is it against the rules to do that? If not, the DNC can simply say NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Is it against the rules to agree not to campaign or participate in MI, and then go ahead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. She's asking to change the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. or PARTICIPATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. There was no obligation to remove one's name from the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. When you ask to change the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Isn't that for the process to determine? All she's doing is raising it. The DNC can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. And the fact that shes raising it right now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Is it against the rules to raise it now? The point of the rules is to set the limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Its not against the rules to raise it now as far as i can see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. I see what you're saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. maybe im dense but i dont understand what your saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. I'll gladly try again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. So by your thinking, if a candidate does something blatantly hypocritical... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Whether it is hypocritical or not is arguable. Whether it is within the rules is far less so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Im not arguing whether its within the rules. obama mooning clinton at a debate is within the rules.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. And Obama is free to choose to do that. It's his race to win or lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. I thought this race was going to be different... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. This is child's play compared to what's coming in the general election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. So your point is, instead of raising the standard of discourse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. My point is: it's a competition, and voters are the judges. We voters determine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Wouldn't you prefer a campaign where no poo was flung? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. There are many things I'd prefer to be other than they are. But voters respond as voters do, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. I think its really sad that you would prefer your candidate to win... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. What I would rather have and what are reality are often two different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. I see your point i think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. My complaining won't change the leve of discourse. The only thing that will change it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Your opinion of your candidates behavior is important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. I'll refer to my daughters again, if you don't mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. There is behavior in soccer, while by the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #113 |
115. It may be that I don't know enough about the rules of soccer - I never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #115 |
117. heres an easy one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #117 |
119. That seems against the rules to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #119 |
121. Those other rules dont apply to whether they break the rules of the soccer game itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Ah, but you're forgetting the other factors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. Thats my point, she broke those other rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:58 AM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Fine - if she broke the rules of the voters, she won't get the votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:11 AM Response to Reply #124 |
126. And you need to understand getting the most votes doesnt make you right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:13 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. "Right" is subjective. "Winning" is the goal of elections, amd the people choosing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:23 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. winning at the cost of bringing down the level of debate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:29 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Your problem then is with the people, the voters. They set the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. What do the people have to do with clintons behavior? You lost me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #131 |
132. I'm not seeking to excuse behavior. I'm saying the panel of judges for that behavior are the voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:41 AM Response to Reply #132 |
133. and im saying bush getting more votes doesnt equal bush's behavior being right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
45. Cllinton = DLC.. DLC fights DNC, therefore Clinton fights DNC. DLC is an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnydrama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
51. I'd like to expand on the rule breaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. but what does it matter if people in florida see an obama commercial, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. They had an agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Again, im not seeing your point clearly. Are you saying because obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. No, the commercial and the delegates are separate issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. And the fact she is asking to revisit it now, as opposed to anytime in the last few months,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. If it's wrong to ask now, it should be against the rules. As it's not, she and all the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Again im not saying raising the issue now is against the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. If that's your reaction, you can choose to show our feelings with your vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. I think even within the rules there are obvious bounderies of hypocrisy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Yes - and that's the point of the electorate. You can cast your vote to show your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. So just to be clear i understand you, you believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. I have no opinion about the "hypocrisy" of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. So you dont care if your candidate is a hypocrite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. I care of my candidate is a hypocrite. But I have no opinion about the alleged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. That to me seems to make about as much sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. Good. Because I don't care if Obama moons Hillary. What difference does it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #101 |
105. But the point is that Clinton doesnt have a legitimate arguement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. I don't agree. I don't know if she has a winning argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #108 |
111. The fact that she is raising a dispute now at this point is itself the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Well, we disagree about that it seems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Im sorry to say but i think you have low standards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #114 |
116. That's okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. thats fine and good for you to do that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #51 |
138. That is incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
59. Deleted message |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
60. It's the DNC rules trashing the Constitution: right to vote? remember that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
george_maniakes (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. They way i see it, all the candidates agreed to write off the delegates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
64. DU is getting stupider by the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
71. Yes, and they like recreational whale torture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
74. Oh how prophetic of you! Any other great ideas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
78. I'm sure a real examination of Hillary's voting record will show how she feels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
95. I already got the memo that the Clintons were sleazy asshats 10 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #95 |
107. It doesn't hurt to remind people though. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
120. Like "The Bush" Family, THE RULES don't apply to the Political Royal Family known as "The Clintons" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:58 AM Response to Reply #120 |
125. Please don't lie. Clinton is operating within the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
128. Too bad Hillary doesn't just fire Dean and put Carville in as the DNC Chairman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #128 |
135. Through their spokesman Carville, the Clintons wanted Harold Ford as DNC Chair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #135 |
142. The same man who stood in ads in front of the Bars and Stars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
137. Special DUzy award: Best thread based on both false assumptions and false logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
141. Our constitution guarantees every citizen the right to vote nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
143. Thanks for taking a look into the depths of their lost souls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC