|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Herman Munster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:56 AM Original message |
I think what Edwards wants is a guarantee of a Supreme Court nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. As president he'll be able to make all the appointments he wants to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. What put that in your pipe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Herman Munster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. if he is to play kingmaker in a brokered convention might as well shoot for the moon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_dem (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. If he's not picking SC nominees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. bullshit..what magic ball told you that????????..nonsense!!.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
6. what if he beats Hillary in South Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. He will .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. THAT would rock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. Just bought a mansion in NC and his wife is sick; I doubt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EffieBlack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. How is he underqualified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He certainly is not underqualified. You obviously know nothing about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I graduate from law school in 3 months. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. According to Wikipedia: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:44 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Beat me to it Blue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I didn't say it was Constitutionally impermissible, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 02:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. My Dad, who has a double doctorate in law, wrote his doctoral thesis on the Supreme Court . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutefisk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 02:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. I agree on all points. Thank you.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Then you must be aware that the Constitution stipulates NO qualifications for a Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Great minds think alike, Saracat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 03:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. He is qualified, but I think he is focused on getting his message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 02:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Order of the Coif in law school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 03:27 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Spending one's career as a civil plaintiff's atty is not the kind of experience 99% of SC nominees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 03:00 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Underqualified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 03:20 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Spending his career arguing before the SCOTUS, working in DOJ, and serving as a fed. judge is zero? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiamondJay (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. good luck getting thru the senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
14. Edwards would be a good choice, he's young and was a Senator making it easier for confirmation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
21. Nah. Not active enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hooraydems06 (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
24. They should give it to him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
29. Oh damn! That would be excellent! I'm with John all the way to the convention! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC