|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:10 PM Original message |
Hillary Clinton has the audacity to raise questions Obama on Rezko... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, no! Bill is funding his library! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. With Saudi money. Pretty disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Tainted money -- from a Saudi. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. $20 mil and the Port Deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. And that is dirty money, how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. When? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #45 |
93. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Sant Singh Chatwal, check out this dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. PROSENSE deflects the ball to Obama; Bill snatches the ball from Obama's fingertips and...TD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #41 |
74. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
94. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
55. Of course you have lots of evidence of this taint and corruption? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Presidential Library? How does that matter in a presidential campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Ah. So ... Hillary is no longer associated with Bill Clinton? They simply have the same last name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Guilty By Association. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Bill Clinton is cashing in on his notoriety for Hillary's benefit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Sorry, the GOP already covered all of us with shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. no. she's not, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:17 PM Original message |
Very simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. Why no link? I like links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. Link to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. So it a LIE! You just made it UP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. No link? No list? How did you get the name you based your OP on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. "MegaHuge Oil & Gas"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Dense? Playing games? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Ask ProSense, it's his post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. If the Denise Rich donation was "reported widely" then you must agree that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
63. Hardly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #53 |
91. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
49. Because, Silly, Donations to The Library Are Indirect Demands For Future Favors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. What about Jeffrey Epstein and Bill's personal and business relationship with him? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's pretty clear that the battle lines have been drawn, and there are no rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. They better not forget that the clintons are total assholes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Maybe the overwhelming majority of Americans who gave Bill Clinton historic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Yeah, yeah..keep drinkin' the koolaid.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Sorry but you are in denial of reality. If it comforts you, stick with it but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
92. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. You again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. That's one of its disadvantages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You've got Bush! Enjoy it while you can! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Huh! You are not making sense, prosense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
78. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. recall that Pop-a-Mole game? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Vaguly....Please refresh my memory. I'm sure I'll be interested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Old game--a mole pops up and player has to be quick to pop it back down--get points. The IP'er |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Thanks...now I remember. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
95. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. Interesting quote from Taylor n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
85. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. well is it smart to throw rocks when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. Questions should and will be asked about both candidates. Neither Hill or Obama are that squeaky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
16. Obama is/was accused of taking a $300k gift/price reduction plus another $10k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. During the debate, that horrible Hillary had the temerity to ask... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. You have that backwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
68. Obama attacked first - then Hillary came back with Rezko. - but the media had Obama on all stations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Clintons throw rocks from their glass house and blame the other guy for fighting back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
29. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. Thanks for reminding me about the MArk Rich fiasco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
37. Isn't this your second slab of Spam about this subject this afternoon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
69. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
38. It's called the Audacity of Hope my dear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
40. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
47. How dare that uppity bitch actually try to CAMPAIGN for the Presidency!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
52. Marc Rich's wife, TOO? How about Bronfman's Wife?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
90. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
54. I asked someone else but was told to ask you...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
56. KNPnta |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
57. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Kick happy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Thanks for making my point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. What's your point: Hillary is distorting the facts? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. "Careful wouldn't want anyone to think that you were an HRC swiftboater." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. I hear Roger Stone is hiring. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Let Taylor Marsh know, she needs a way to make an honest living. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. He's looking for Hill Haters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jan-23-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Hill Haters? Is that what the response to facts these days? Anything in the OP not true? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 01:01 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. A lot of that stuff is just conjecture and innunedo, and that's the same way they swiftboated Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
72. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
75. Fact check: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
76. The Clintons are working with the Bushes to stay in power - at all costs!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
79. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
80. poo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
81. Billary has no other choice - Whitewater needs to be rehashed for the people, the younger people.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
83. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-24-08 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
84. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
86. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
87. so, is it ok with you guys that Obama has a 17 year relationship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
89. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 13th 2024, 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC