|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:00 PM Original message |
RePost. Nominating the Clintons is a bad idea!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, lucky for us, only one of them can be nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Don't tell them that..they don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well, rest easy. We aren't going to nominate "them" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Blah..blah..blah.."Wellsley Lesbian"..blah..blah..blah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. Prepared to be flamed by the Kool-Aid drinking Hillbots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Hillbots, and Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
28. I find that offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. HRC = Democratic Death-Wish In Motion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. Repost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. If this stuff didn't work to get Bush out of office last time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. I disagree - Clinton would have all the "mandates for Change" - and produce on them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. based on what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. 100% agree. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. If there is a more divisive candidate out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. I disagree. With the economy in the crapper, people are going to vote for ANY Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. It is not simply about winning the election...it is about governing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. She is the most competent candidate running in either Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The problem is she's never shown any leadership, even when she's had real power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
16. Good lord, the hyperbole never ends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gdaerin (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
17. What if Obama ran on a third party ticket? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. In a coalition of Black and independent voters? He might win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
18. K&R. Some people just don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
19. third time is a charm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swoop (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
20. I just don't get the truth out of Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. "We have only won a majority twice since. Carter in 1976 and AL Gore in 2000" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 07:59 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Ooops you are right...So we have onlu had a majority once since 1964 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
24. One need only to look at the voting records of Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBorders (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
25. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 01st 2024, 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC