|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:07 PM Original message |
Edwards Dropped The "A-Bomb" Last Night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. is nuclear power environmentally friendly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I was hoping more people would pipe up and explain, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. The projections that say "but we neeeeeed it!" don't bother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. People mocked Jimmy Carter way back when for trying to urge conservation - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Well as with global warming, there's a lot of conflicting information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. All of the nuclear 'accidents' in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Neither are good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. nuclear power accidents are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. not that rare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-17-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. it is not easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Anyone who's been in the Environment/Energy forum knows what a hot-button issue this is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. So what's the agreed on alternative, or is there not a consensus? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Far from a consensus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. OK, thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. They had to shut down how many plants in CT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Did you forget Three Mile Island and Chernobyl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. No one is forgetting them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Nuclear reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TokenWasp (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Can't keep the old ones safely maintained... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Was it really 30 years ago that however many plants in CT were shut down by the NRC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TokenWasp (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. When were they built... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Without incident? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bad for EDWARDS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Dissmissing nuclear power? We have lots of nuclear power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I think we need to take a closer look at the French model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. The French had a drought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
17. And please do check this out! "Nuclear Costs Explode" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. The TBO article is the future of Wind and Solar, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Good show of spine by Edwards, I support adding many many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. Simple: nuclear power is not environmentally friendly, economic, or efficient. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. If I remember from last night, Edwards objection was mostly due to the nuclear waste problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. No solution, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
25. Nuclear power is not a viable option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. nuclear is a definite option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-17-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Counter points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC