|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:22 AM Original message |
Poll question: Should The Debate Participants Be Confined To Those Who Have A Realistic Chance Of Winning The Nom ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Realistic should mean they're poll numbers are larger than the margin of error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. Of course not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RuleOfNah (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. Exchange of ideas... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. That really is the problem though... Who decides which candidates had/have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. No, I think Edwards should be there too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
6. Mercer for Prez! 70 reasons for his candidacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Oh wow...Number 56: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
8. Define "realistic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uben (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. Equal time for every candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
11. By this point in the process, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Maybe we need the cages rattled a little. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
12. Equal time for all.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
13. If debates were actual debates, rather than talk shows with candidates on them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
14. It will be the MSM who define realistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
16. If they are still on the ballot ... they should be allowed to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
17. The game is fixed enough as it is. Why play along? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC