Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush and Clinton shared advocate: Bob Johnson worked for Bush first

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:28 PM
Original message
Bush and Clinton shared advocate: Bob Johnson worked for Bush first
I am truly flummoxed by this. After Johnson made his derogatory remarks about Obama, I am amazed to read that he worked for Bush first.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=3ecbba91-f447-455b-98a3-d92f522a4814

Robert L. Johnson came to the Bush administration's attention when it needed him most. The cause of the White House's duress was an annoyingly munificent collection of millionaires, headed by Bill Gates Sr., who had banded together to oppose President Bush's plan to abolish the estate tax. In newspaper ads and press conferences, they held forth on the obligation of the wealthy to give back to society. So effectively did they seize the moral high ground that even the most fervent opponents of the estate tax resigned themselves to it. ...


Evidently this didn't sit well with Johnson, the billionaire founder of Black Entertainment Television (BET), whose family stood to gain millions if Bush succeeded. Johnson is not a man with a deep sense of social obligation. Not long ago, when an interviewer prodded him for his views on philanthropy, Johnson scoffed, "$(B$)eing a very wealthy person is not something that I wake up in the morning and say, 'Gee, I got all this money. How do I give it away?'" There is, however, an important exception to this every-man-for-himself ethos: society's duty to aid extremely wealthy African Americans. This social obligation Johnson takes very seriously.


Wow, nice guy full of compassion. So what was his campaign for the White House?

Almost no one--not even the White House--had thought to frame the issue this way. And for good reason: It is a bizarre inversion of the truth. "Elimination of the Estate Tax," Johnson's ad argued, using extraneous capitalizations for emphasis, "will help close the wealth gap in this nation between African American families and White families." But the estate tax is paid only by people who inherit large fortunes, and black people, as one might suspect, are far less likely than white people to do so.


The Estate Tax was repealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. why are you amazed
I think it is pretty apparent by now the clintons are honorary members of the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. True, yet I still am oddly amazed that they would be so blatant about it.
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. why not?
she keeps that slime Mark Penn on her payroll. They get away with it because the average voter/TV viewer will never find out about it. It pays to have the Corporate media in your pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do you dare attack the Clintons? You must be a Republican?
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 05:32 PM by Mass
:sarcasm:

And yes, I knew that Bob Johnson was not exactly a progressive, no surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But blatantly helping BUSH? That is beyond the pale, as is the
Clinton campaign for using him as their attack dog. Which party are they with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Which party are they (Clintons) with?
The Elitist Party.

Only us peons think in terms of Democrat or Republican.

The Elitist Party represents the basic power behind both parties, and every once in awhile they get scared of a rise in populist candidates (Obama and Edards) that could threaten their gravy train and they forget that certain puppets are supposed to represent one party or another, not switch sides while spouting the same old lines as they did in the past.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just now saw the Johnson clip, what a scumbag!
why the hell don't they (CLintons) denounce the comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC