|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:04 PM Original message |
Why are all the networks talking about EXIT POLLING after the 2000 disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. wondering myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe they are less afraid of Bush and the Repubs now. They got them to stop exit polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. What disaster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. It wasn't the exit polling that was unreliable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. you mean 2004 right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know where you got that impression. They decided after '04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. No that's not what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. What disaster? The exit polls were right on the money in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
9. (sorry) BECAUSE IT WASN'T A "DISASTER"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. The disaster was not the exit polls in 2000. It was the networks handling of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 01st 2024, 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC