Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Nevada stop the momentum?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:28 AM
Original message
Will Nevada stop the momentum?
It looks as though Hillary will lose both NH and SC if this happens she will be wounded I think but still not out of this thing. Currently She has a huge lead in Nevada and if our governor is any indication she may hold that lead here.

Will it be the state that stops the momentum and renews her campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stop the momentum? No. Assuming Obama wins NH and SC, he's in the driver seat to win.
I think if Barack wins Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina he's in a good position to win the nomination. Clearly.

Hillary's going to win Nevada. We know that. But her best bet is after Nevada, focus on the Feb. 5th states. Try and wedge them your way. If she can score big on the 5th, she's back in the game.

Obviously losing Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina would be horrible for her. But she's still in the game when she wins Nevada and goes into Feb. 5th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Firstly, it's not a given she'll win Nevada
There hasn't been a poll out of there is about a month. Secondly, Clinton is wounded NOW! Thanks to the compressed schedule, why do you think she's going so negative and swinging wildly into the wind hoping to land a punch? If she loses NH, she's as good as done. It's funny, if it were the other way around and Clinton had won Iowa...her supporters would be doing the same thing Obama supporters are. Obama and Clinton were the only ones capable of running the table early. Anyone who gets ran over is not getting the nomination. Period. I know that's hard for some Clinton supporters to admit, but it's the truth. If Hillary loses NH, it's a SERIOUS blow to her candidacy. A blow she is not likely to recover from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, Nevada is before SC
Also that Culinary Workers endorsement I hear is pretty big there, and if Obama wins NH, i think he just might get it. The biggest thing about Nevada is which poll is right that was taken over a month ago. There is an ARG poll that has her up 27, but a mason dixon poll taken the same time has her up only 8 with Edwards completely out of the picture. A lot has changed since then and Obama and to some extent Edwards should be gaining. The question is, how much does he actually need to gain to overtake her there as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well I wouldn't count too heavily on the Culinary union
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 12:36 AM by Egnever
They are a huge union but they didn't help Dean at all last time. You are right though it is before SC something I hadn't thought about so a win here would help her but an obama win in SC after would probably negate any help she got from Nevada. Thanks for pointing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But imagine Obama winning the Culinary Union's endorsement.
That could have an impact. I always thought that Obama would win those three and Hillary would win NV, but I think that was just me trying to be fair. I think he will win all four, especially if that mason-dixon poll is more in line with what is going on in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well I hope you are right
I will tell you this. I am signed up to all the campaigns. Hillary's contacted me early about 6-8 months ago but I haven't heard from them since. Obamas campaign is the only other one I have been contacted by and they dog me weekly in fact there was a volunteer at my door today.

Also when I went to the debate here there was clearly more support for hillary in the room than anyone else but... outside in the parking lot Obama had the biggest presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Don't feel bad. I was confused about it to.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:22 AM by Bleachers7
Everyone is saying that SC is before Nevada. That's not true. I think this is Hillary's chance if she loses NH.

The Nevada primary was Feb. 15, 2004. Kerry had it locked up by then. Dean got 17% and finished ahead of Edwards. Obviously, 2008 will be different. There will still be a race.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/dates/02/14/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. self delete - wrong place in thread
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 12:48 AM by LVZ


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nevada's Dem chair is Rory Reid, son of Harry Reid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. If he wins NH. Its over
Nevada and SC will have huge minority participation. And although she is popular with minorities. Its hard to believe she will be able to beat him there after he's won the first two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Turnout will be much lower here
I think Obama's momentum could propel him to a win here too but only if the turnout is much higher than predicted. Nevada is new (and inexperienced) with a "meaningful" caucus experience. Most political pundits had predicted a meager 30-50,000 participants prior to Iowa. With the major Iowa media focus, however, that is probably a bit low. Even so I still don't expect more than 100,000.

The Culinary Union endorsement (expected immediately after the NH primary) is very important, especially if there is a low turnout.

http://lasvalley.com/702/viewtopic.php?id=1310

http://lasvalley.com/702/viewtopic.php?id=1266

http://gleaner.typepad.com/

http://mysilverstate.com/frontPage.do

http://democrat.meetup.com/7/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The Culinary Union didnt help Dean last time
But there was higher than expected turnout so if you are right and turnout is low it will. I am not sure turnout will be low though there were a ton of people at the temp chair meeting I went to and it was only one of 4 scheduled that weekend.

However someone reminded me above that NV is between NH and SC and if she wins here and loses in SC I think that erases the effect of any win here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Wasn't the race already over by then, hence no incentive for union push? n/t
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 12:59 AM by LVZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. you know i dont really remember where the race stood at that point
I do remember the turn out though we had to go to a football field instead of indoors because too many poeple showed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't see how Hillary winning such a small state can stop the Obama momentum
Say O. wins NH and SC; then I see Hillary needing to win Nevada to simply stay in the race, never mind reversing the momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Again, it is an important fact to remember that Nevada is before SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yep had I remembered that I likely wouldn't have made the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. If my experience going up to NV to canvass was any indication.
It may be harder for Clinton than they think. Nevada is caucusing for the first time in a Pres. election. A lot of voters aren't sure how to do it so it will be tricky for all the campaigns to get them out to caucus. However, Obama has a big organization there and is getting voters pledged to caucus. That's very critical and here's why: I knocked on doors in 2 towns on the outskirts of Vegas. While support for Clinton was 3 to one over Obama, barely any of her supporters planned to caucus for her. Every Obama supporter had either committed to caucus or we filled out a pledge card that day. That means that they will be contacted several times before the caucus and the campaign will get them there.

The Obama campaign was up and running there well before any of the other candidates. The same is true here in AZ. Clinton's campaign just opened an office this weekend. Ours has been open since October. We've been canvassing and phone banking non-stop since then. They are 3 months behind us and vote by mail ballots are already going out. The Obama campaign has similar efforts going all over the country, even in places like Utah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. interesting
I will atest to the fact that His campaign has conteacted me over and over and over while hers only did once. He definatley has a stron organization here.

Thanks for posting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I was only contacted by the Hillary folks ...
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:08 AM by LVZ
Out on the southwestern fringes of the Las Vegas valley, I have only had front-door contact by Clinton volunteers, one week ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Odd that
I am in the Southwest also Rainbow and 215 area
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. You may have had Obama folks come by when you weren't home.
We don't always leave lit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. 32 offices in 17 states
He didn't spend all those millions in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary will have momentum if she finishes a close second on Tuesday
The polling trend, media narrative about Obama being unstoppable, etc. have raised expectations for Obama to a point where a close second would be enough for Hillary to anoint herself as the "comeback gal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. losing NH
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:23 AM by BringBigDogBack
is a bad thing for her, period.

Clinton's shouldn't lose in New Hampshire. They're royalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Bill lost New Hampshire
He was second but did better than expected and declared himself the "Comeback Kid." The rest is history...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Bill wasn't running against Obama...
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:24 AM by BringBigDogBack
now was he? History isn't always the best judge of the present situation.

He's run a near-perfect campaign, his message is resonating, and he's bringing new voters out in droves.

Losing NH IS NOT AN OPTION FOR CLINTON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. He was running against heavyweights of the day
He did not wrap up the nomination until the late New York primary. The canonizing of Obama is hilarious. If he loses he will be just another footnote in history like Gary Hart and Jesse Jackson. If he wins it will be different, but the outcome has not been determined when just one of fifty states has voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Over 500.000 donors
speaks pretty loudly

We'll see how it all plays out. I'm not calling anything for anyone yet, just sharing my opinion of what it will mean for Clinton's campaign if she does lose NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Jesse Jackson registered two million new voters
And he still lost, even though he did take the lead in the delegate count at one point. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. No comparison.
Bill was an unknown Arkasas governor at that time. The type of person who makes a "comeback" in a Primary. Hillary Clinton is a mega-celebrity. She cannot ever be an underdog. Coming in 3rd in Iowa was bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. If Obama wins NH,
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:20 AM by BringBigDogBack
he wins SC & NV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Already stated before: NV is "before" SC - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. I don't think she has a huge lead
The last polls were done in early December.
ARG did show her having a big lead, but they haven't shown they can poll accurately outside of NH.
Mason-Dixon, around the same time, showed Clinton ahead by only 8.

If that's true, the bounce Obama gets from Iowa and NH would be enough to at least turn it into a close contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC