Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seeking compromise. Now, about Biden...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:10 AM
Original message
Seeking compromise. Now, about Biden...
Women's rights are near and dear to me.
I am NOT a fan of Biden's...as I have stated more than once. I felt he was a sellout on bankruptcy bill and also some of the judicial nominees that he voted for rubbed me the wrong way.
I am willing to be CONVINCED to compromise on him.
He will never be my first choice, but the person who was my 2nd choice has just moved completely off the radar.
Someone explain to me what his EXACT role was in the Bork nomination and how it supposedly saved Roe v. Wade.
Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I had to cross someone off my list today, too. Give Dodd a closer look, he stood up for us on FISA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would suggest that you start with Wiki...
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:38 AM by 1corona4u
it seems fairly accurate...but here is a start for you.

Bork;

Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell was a moderate, and even before his expected retirement on June 27, 1987, Senate Democrats had asked liberal leaders to form "a solid phalanx" to oppose whoever President Ronald Reagan nominated to replace him; Democrats warned Reagan there would be a fight.

Reagan nominated Bork for the seat on July 1, 1987.

Within 45 minutes of Bork's nomination to the Court, Ted Kennedy (D-MA) took to the Senate floor with a strong condemnation of Bork in a nationally televised speech, declaring, "Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of government." TV ads narrated by Gregory Peck attacked Bork as an extremist. Kennedy's speech successfully fueled widespread public skepticism of Bork's nomination. The rapid response of Kennedy's "Robert Bork's America" speech stunned the Reagan White House; though conservatives considered Kennedy's accusations slanderous, the attacks went unanswered for two and a half months.

A hotly contested United States Senate debate over Bork's nomination ensued, partly fueled by strong opposition by civil and women's rights groups concerned with what they claimed was Bork's desire to roll back civil rights decisions of the Warren and Burger courts. Bork is one of three Supreme Court nominees to ever be opposed by the ACLU.

During debate over his nomination, Bork's video rental history was leaked to the press, which led to the enactment of the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act. His video rental history was unremarkable, and included such harmless titles as A Day at the Races, Ruthless People and The Man Who Knew Too Much. The list of rentals was originally printed by Washington D.C.'s City Paper.

To pro-choice legal groups, Bork's originalist views and his belief that the Constitution does not contain a general "right to privacy" were viewed as a clear signal that, should he become a Justice on the Supreme Court, he would vote to reverse the Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade. Accordingly, a large number of left-wing groups mobilized to press for Bork's rejection, and the resulting 1987 Senate confirmation hearings became an intensely partisan battle. Bork was faulted for his bluntness before the committee, including his criticism of the reasoning underlying Roe v. Wade. On October 23, 1987, the Senate rejected Bork's confirmation, with 42 Senators voting in favor and 58 voting against. Senators David Boren (D-OK) and Ernest Hollings (D-SC) voted in favor, with Senators John Chafee (R-RI), Bob Packwood (R-OR), Richard Shelby (D-AL), Arlen Specter (R-PA), Robert Stafford (R-VT), John Warner (R-VA) and Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. (R-CT) all voting nay. The vacant seat on the court to which Bork was nominated eventually went to Judge Anthony Kennedy.

The history of Bork's disputed nomination is still a lightning rod in the contentious debate over the limits of the "Advice and Consent of the Senate" that Article Two of the United States Constitution requires for judicial nominees of the President.

Bork, unhappy with his treatment in the nomination process, resigned his appellate-court judgeship in 1988.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork
-------------------



At any rate, Joe Biden was the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, at that time, and played a huge role in keeping Bork from being confirmed. There are a lot of articles out there about it, and if you do a search on Google, you'll find all the info you can stand.

Here is one;


-----------------


Mr. Biden's assurances that he will oppose the nomination represented an important shift by the powerful liberal Democrat that could add to pressures on uncommitted Senators, Presidential candidates and other prominent Democrats to take early positions on the Bork nomination. In the past, Mr. Biden has sought to avoid a politically and ideologically partisan approach to judicial nominations.

Some liberal and civil rights groups say that stopping Judge Bork's nomination will be their major priority of the Reagan era.

Judge Bork, who sits on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is known to have conservative positions on such issues as abortion, capital punishment and government aid to religious schools. It has been widely assumed that, if seated, he could tip the balance of the Supreme Court to the right for years to come.

A civil rights official who attended the meeting today and spoke on the condition that he not be identified said of Mr. Biden, ''He made it very clear to us that he knows what he's going to do, and that he considers the confirmation fight so important that he's willing to work on this, and not on the Presidential campaign.''

According to Congressional sources, among those attending today's meeting with Senator Biden were Ralph G. Neas, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights; Judith L. Lichtman of the Women's Legal Defense Fund; Elaine Jones, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and Nan Aron of the Alliance for Justice.

Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee also said today that hearings on Judge Bork's nomination would not begin until Sept. 15.

Mr. Biden, speaking at a news conference, promised a ''full and thorough and fair'' review of the qualifications of Judge Bork. Biggest Nomination in Years

''This is probably the most significant Supreme Court nomination in the last several decades, and arguably in this century,'' Mr. Biden said.

But for all the talk of open-mindedness, Mr. Biden left little doubt about where he stood on the nomination.

At stake, Mr. Biden said was whether the Reagan Administration's agenda would be accomplished through the Court, and whether Judge Bork had been picked to accomplish it, according to accounts of those at the meeting.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE0DA1331F93AA35754C0A961948260





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. and that is one of the reasons I am so adamantly supporting Biden...he has spine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well done
Many people do not realize what a historical moment this was. Too often people remember things that DID happen, not the things that were prevented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's So Strange...
But in watching Biden this evening on the CSpan coverage I heard a man thank Biden for keeping Bork from the court.

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I noticed that too
Informed voters are a beautiful thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC