|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
_Wayne_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 05:44 PM Original message |
Have Hillary and Wesley Clark privately agreed to run together? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Perhaps there is no nefarious reason. Perhaps Clark believes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well, I'm not sure the VP candidate will change a diehard anti Hillary voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
67. I love Clark..but even if I was guaranteed he would be her VP pick, I still will not caucus for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'd support a Clinton/Clark ticket. Kerry/Clark would've won in '04. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. OOOOOOOOH consipirary conspirary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. I suspect if she gets the nomination, he'll be VP candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. If she's really smart, she'll want him for VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. of course they have a deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phen43 (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. "Cheney in a Pant-Suit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Another Hillary Hater using right wing propoganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. And he's not too much taller than she is. Yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. That's an interesting take. I assume Clark is HOPING and angling for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. That Might Explain Clark's Sudden Lurch to the Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. There has been no "sudden lurch to the right." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. you are correct, he has always been there. he was never "left". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
60. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hard to say, but odds are he's on her very, very, verrry short list. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. I agree, he is definitely on the short list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. yep, I said this last night in 2 other threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. If Clark was Hillary's running mate I might consider voting for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
18. No. There is no deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think a better reason is to look at what area HRC could need help in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. I can't imagine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 07:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. I thought Clark hadn't been out long enough for SoD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. SoD=10 years out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. Wes Clark as Veep? Bring it on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Just a couple of corrections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Richardson is DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. Impossible to say! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
26. Finally a thread concerning Hillary that neither pumps or disses her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. but still with it's share of inaccuracies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. C'mon, ya can't pick on every little detail..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. It's progress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
27. I don't know about the running togeather, some say he got in to stop Edwards in the last election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Wes Clark "got in to stop" Edwards.....who at the time that Clark got in, in'03, was polling at 2%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. can you, perhaps, links to anyone who said that? I thought I'd heard it all on DU about Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Yeah, I'd like to see links to that too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
62. Psstt... one small point: Edwards wouldn't have won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. It Was The Clintons Who Got The Arkansan to Run in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #34 |
56. If Jimmy Carter is a "Clinton"...then Yes, The Clintons got Clark to run! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
35. Wouldn't we then be voting for two former Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. I'm afraid, technically, yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. What is technically a yes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. they both have clear Republican sympathies in their background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. He gave a speech on foreign policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Is that the speech in which he said something like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I'm afraid that was a terrible abuse of the word "technically" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. fine, let's not say 'technically', but I don't know why it's not OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #51 |
69. The NYT supports your assertion that Clark is a former Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. But there is no supporting quote and that reporter was notorious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 07:04 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. And, anyway, 'technically' IS what I meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Bullshit. Have you ever heard of Independents? Is that a radical new concept to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
83. Your post is self-evident, and not news to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Venable I'm sorry but these words carry too strong a charge on a political board to use so loosely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Are you under the impression Gen. Clark was once a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #41 |
65. According to the NYT Clark STATED that he was "A Republican" and he would have voted FOR the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. Nagourney is a shill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. So the man is LYING? That's a tough call. I'm not inclined to accept even a shill would flatly lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. Nagourney would lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. I replied to this point above... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
82. Nagourney is famously slanted and spins like a top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #35 |
63. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
42. I sure hope so!-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
43. OH MY GOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
50. Hillary needs a winner for VP, Gov K Sebelius would be better. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
54. If Rudy Giuliani is the nominee, Hillary won't pick Clark-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. OMG! It seems that I can't support any of these people save for Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
57. Clark has no DLC connections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. But if HRC wins it's not wrong to believe that the DLC will be a large part of The Executive Branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. No - it's not wrong to believe that, but the OP didn't say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Thanks for the clarification. I humbly stand corrected. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. That was very big of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. No, it's called accepting when one has been in error - and making the mental and open correction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. I meant that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Very Good. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #59 |
76. They would have some real influence I suspect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. This point seems hard to grasp here, but you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. I agree with your characterization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
61. It doesn't work that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-29-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
73. I don't know...but Wes was REALLY on the Hillary kick on Bill Maher's show last week... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC