|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:18 PM Original message |
Can an Obama supporter straighten this out, re: Kyl /Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. The problem with Kyl-Lieberman isn't the terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I can appreciate the validity of that, but there's been a lot of heat around here re: the IRG issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. What matters is the context for the entire bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Agreed. Lieberman has no good intentions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Strongly disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. the K/L bill has language that gives Bush room to go to war with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wrong...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. What is it? I am a Clinton apologist, but I like Obama and dislike unfair charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. It is not unfair. No one held anyone's had to vote for the Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. The question was whether it was unfair to Obama, not Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. You can read what Jim Webb says about Kyl-Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That ultimate fate of a bill isn't quite relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Difference Webb had the common sense not to vote for it. He had GOOD Judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I wouldn't have voted for it either. I agree it sucks, I'm just trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. The fact that it never made it out of committee is the first clue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
8. link provided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Thank you. I agree the Iran/Iraq link has not been made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. The IRG issue is the same as "endorsing the Petraus view" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Providing aid to Hamas, PIJ, and Hezbollah. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. And there you have it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-16-07 08:11 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Because Hamas isn't at war with the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. Dodd and Obama aren't the only ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. They had the foresight to know the amendment was wrong and did not vote for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Thank you. My inquiry was only on the IRG aspect. If that's no big deal, that clarifies the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Does anyone have any idea if a sponsor can pull his or her name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. That's just the sort of thing I was wondering. Did S970 contain IRG language when Obama signed on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Whoa!! You're saying Obama can't speak on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. That's an over-reaction, Atomic Kitten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
23. ***THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR INPUT*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-15-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. Wow. Just...wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-16-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Wow.Just...wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 03rd 2024, 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC