|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 PM Original message |
Hillary Clinton Against Impeaching Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Funny, nowhere in the article did i see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Which Presidential candidates are for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Kucinich has only filed articles against Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. Friday's Child Against Hillary Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Purveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. To hell with impeachment, I want to know what candidate would extradite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well all I have to say is lead, follow or get out of the way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. How many threads do we need to point out that JE and HRC also do not favor impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. Hillary's hubby is pals with the Bushes and is in cahoots with the House of Saud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. Wow! What a blatant and obvious Attack Hillary, Inc. thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. impeaching clinton hurt the reps, impeaching bush might hurt the dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You conveniently left out Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 03:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Pardon me??? Impeaching Clinton hurt the Reps, you say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. No, the polls at the time said! I report, you decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Worried about votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 06:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. No, the polls at the time said! I report, you decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
52. Impeaching for a blow job may have hurt the pukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. Well, there's a shocker . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. I am not a Senator Clinton supporter, but for all of those who are condemning her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
29. You are correct...I will not vote for a democrat who does not support impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Looks like you won't be voting for our nominee, but I think you are a minority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. What a crock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. This analogy is a stretch, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. It is a duty to impeach... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Senators don't even get a say until it goes through the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. "Duty" is a complex thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Hopeless and symbolic act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. My point is if there's practically no chance to convict... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #61 |
68. I understand your point, but Pelosi took it off the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. I recommend this response from another DUer in a different thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-01-07 07:57 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. I truly hope what you believe is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. A little off topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. That I'll agree with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #54 |
67. Thanks for the break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. It's actually prettty common for prosecuters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. That's true If they don't have the evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. How about if they already know who the jury is and they know how they will vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:13 AM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Doesn't matter one whit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. You miss the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:02 AM Response to Reply #53 |
63. No, I think YOU miss the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. X |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 06:02 AM Response to Reply #29 |
62. you are turning impeachment into an issue to divided Democrats against Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
15. OK...Get Polosi to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:16 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. There's something to be said for doing the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. No! This is a democracy, and we have a Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. There is no process when you take impeachment off the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. "Impeachment off the table" is not any legal or Constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #49 |
64. Sorry, but that just doesn't make any sense at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 08:50 AM Response to Reply #64 |
70. The only candidate who can bring impeachment charges has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-01-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Democrats need leaders, not followers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-01-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. I can certainly agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
56. Were you there in '73-74? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 03:53 AM Response to Original message |
18. It's not really Hillary Clinton's decision to make. I can understand her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Worried about how it would be portrayed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
57. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benny05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
21. Mrs. Clinton will be against it after what happened to Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. Impeachment is the most important issue of the year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
25. Any candidate who does not support impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:25 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Agenda before country...sounds like the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:27 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Yes, how ironic it will be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ValiantBlue (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
58. Irony of ironies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:09 AM Response to Reply #58 |
65. Perfect example of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'm Not One Of Her Supporters Either... But I Myself Am UNDECIDED When |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. That's the whole problem...dems are afraid of doing what's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Personally I've Been Talking REVOLUTION For Much Longer Than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
59. The reason for beginning the process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
44. What's with more replies than views? 43>39 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
46. So what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. I also oppose ousting Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-30-07 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
69. Of course she is. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-01-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
74. So shes against impeachment shes against pulling troops out of Iraq my question is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-01-07 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
76. At least she has a real reason not to have the BALLS to be for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC