...and that's saying something.
Public Financing and Obama: How Will it Play Out?
By Angela Dorazio
Posted on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 11:56:40 AM EST
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) has raised many eyebrows in the past few weeks with his novel, somewhat surprising, suggestion regarding the potential public funding of his campaign for the presidency. On Feb. 1, the Obama Exploratory Committee submitted a request to the Federal Elections Commission for an Advisory Opinion (AO). The committee is asking the FEC if it is within legal limits for Sen. Obama to "provisionally" take funds from private donors for his campaign but to also have the option, should he get the Democratic nomination, of returning those contributions in order to accept public funds. However, this would only happen if the Republican opponent also agreed to do so.
This proposition is wrought with intrigue, not to mention brilliant strategy. By making the request to the FEC, Sen. Obama has made it publicly known that he is not precluding the use of public funds. That's likely to make some supporters of public financing very happy, especially after the disappointment such individuals may have felt after Hillary Clinton -by some media accounts - single-handedly killed the presidential public financing system. The proposition, if accepted by the FEC and if Sen. Obama becomes the Democratic nominee, also presents a challenge to the Republican opponent to fight fair. The political costs incurred by the Republican nominnee for turning down such a noble challenge are immeasureable.
Essentially, Sen. Obama has strategically placed himself in very good situation. First, he has asserted himself as the only presidential candidate so far who is the least bit interested in salvaging the presidential public financing system. Second, Sen. Obama, if he does become the Democratic nominee, has created a situation where either he and his Republican opponent will compete fairly with public funds or they don't but only because the Republican doesn't want to, making it publicly clear to every American that fair and clean elections are only a priority to the Democratic nominee.
I'm not sure if this is how we want public financing systems to be managed in this country, but it's better than nothing, and beyond that, Sen. Obama certainly deserves an A+ for campaign strategy.
http://www.commonblog.com/story/2007/2/23/103536/082***
EDIT: Of course, he also co-sponsored Feingold's reform proposal.
Obama Co-Sponsoring Reform of Public Financing System
By Paul Silver
Senator Obama is the first presidential candidate to co-sponsor S. 436, essential legislation introduced by Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) to fix the presidential public financing system for future presidential elections.
Senator Obama has provided important national leadership by becoming the first presidential candidate to sponsor vitally-needed reform legislation to protect the integrity of the presidency and to join in the battle for its passage.
<SNIP>
According to the letter, ”H.R. 776 also has been endorsed by the Committee for Economic Development, an organization of national business leaders and educators, and by Americans for Campaign Reform, an organization whose bipartisan leadership includes former Senators Bill Bradley (D-NJ), Warren Rudman (R-NH), Bob Kerrey (D-NE), and Alan Simpson (R-WY)…”
http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/10947/obama-co-sponsoring-reform-of-public-financing-system/