|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:07 AM Original message |
I just looked at the new released emails, and two things leapt out at me: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm thinking door number three. They're just stonewalling as ALWAYS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I'll join you at Door #3 and here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. There is no way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I have to agree on this statement totally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. I don't doubt what you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. I think they missed the over all picture because.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. You got that right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Yep..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NovaNardis
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. It would make sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
64. They thought they had "the math", remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
63. Enjoy it while you can: They fully intend to STEAL 2008, and if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
72. nobody expected the levees to be breached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynzM
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
74. I think they've always been sloppy when it comes to computer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Perhaps not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 07:51 AM Response to Reply #14 |
91. 181/2 minutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I'll second that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. K&R - Get this to top of front page for possible LEAHY or WAXMAN ATTN. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. The fourth possibility is probably the right one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. But they didn't expect to lose Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Remember how Bush tried to play nice with Pelosi right after the elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
80. HUBRIS...dependably bringing down tyrants for thousands of years, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #80 |
93. great slogan for a bumpersicker, Raksha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
57. And that's why it's so incredibly important to keep Joe Lieberman happy, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 02:17 AM Response to Reply #57 |
84. Sen. Lieberman won't join this mafia. If anything, expect Repugs to jump ship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
94. That's been debunked here many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
4. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
6. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. Considering how inept every person in this misadministration seems to be, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He is savvy enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
65. Actually, Karl Rove is a computer whiz kid.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'd get the server administrations up in front of Congress to testify. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
52. Oh, but they'll give the usual Republican testimony... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #52 |
66. They'd plead the 5th, prolly even before they showed up, like Monica Goodling did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #52 |
110. You forgot their favorite. It was Clinton's fault! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. Ptech access to WH, DOJ, DOD etc computer systems... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. This is extremely important but it may get overlooked here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
54. Read Renata Adler's '76 Atlantic Monthly article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
67. That was one kick-ass post, Starroute! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #35 |
78. Dude, Monica Goodling's attny John Dowd is an expert on...ta da... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #35 |
81. Great post...deserves its own thread. A keeper. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
exlrrp
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
95. "Follow The Money"-- A Deep Throat Quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Again, the original source of that money wasn't traced back into Chile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
102. Deserves its own thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgorenfeld
![]() |
Fri Apr-27-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
117. Gary Jarmin & Response Dynamics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
16. Who was the damn idiot that didn't feed the documents correctly for scanning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dalloway
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
17. man, get this recommended so people can get this to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
18. I question whether document EOUSA127-150.pdf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
19. Document OAG12-22-NEW-.pdf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
20. REC'ed, sup Joisey? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
21. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
22. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
23. Tandalayo: Try contacting the Judiciary Committee staff, particularly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. I sent them a message from the committee site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
109. Talk to CorpGovActivist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Drat. Please substitute Waxman for Leahy and House for Senate in my comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
24. Did the RNC get help from Microsoft directly maybe? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Unlikely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Why? Doesn't Microsoft give hefty campaign contributions to the Repub candidates? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Microsoft has been very tied in to the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #44 |
83. If what you and supernova say above, in 5 and 9, is true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
79. Maybe they made a "special exchange server" in exchange for Ashcroft's help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
101. Doubtful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
30. Dunno about the EOP, but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. My expeience and knowledge taught me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. Ok, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 05:10 AM Response to Reply #48 |
86. Dana Perrino said in today's WH briefing that emails may have been lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #86 |
97. Ptech operates the WH and DOJ systems. Hmmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
38. K/R! Organized criminal effort; I hope Waxman gets to the bottom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
39. Did the original emails that were released contain the headers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Looking at the Emails in the dump... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 05:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
87. In answer to your subject line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. CALL THE STAFF AT THE COMMITTEE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #42 |
92. Here, here - I've found that staff manning committee phones take more call details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
46. Tandalayo and anybody else who knows such things: Does this part make sense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Hardly plausable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redacted
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Complete, total, and utter BULLshit. Tandalayo nails it again, as usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Princess Turandot
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 06:32 AM Response to Reply #46 |
89. In my experience (user side not tech).. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #89 |
103. In the process of conversion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
50. what post #42 said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
51. could this be a good thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
53. If you want someone more than a phone kid, here's how to flush them out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
56. Stonewalling plus intentionally set up. They are not, repeat NOT, incompetent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
58. Excellent Post, TS ! Thanks ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suziedemocrat
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
59. My bet is they set it up specifically to be able to "wipe out" data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Exchange is not setup to destroy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. I thought all government communications were supposed to be archived! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Yurp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. the irony I have not heard mentioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #73 |
98. They can say what they will, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Apr-15-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #98 |
114. no, the Hatch act says don't use govt equipt for politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
62. It ain't rocket science.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #62 |
100. Two points: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Mon Apr-16-07 05:18 AM Response to Reply #62 |
115. Unforunately I suspect a good deal of the problem is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
69. Tharze also the spam control layer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
75. Wow - speechless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
76. IMO This is BS, the only valid compliance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Fri Apr-13-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
77. No way, no how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
82. The RNC / WH might be hiding something bigger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 02:22 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. LEAHY KNEW? E-mails sought by special prosecutor also missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 05:56 AM Response to Original message |
88. I'm far from an expert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #88 |
99. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #99 |
105. I really rather they got them in the original electronic form |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #99 |
107. Reading the PDF files of the Conyers and Waxman letters they did specify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Here's link for Conyers letter specifying the data he wanted included with emails. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durtee librul
![]() |
Sun Apr-15-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. Just read the Conyers letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
90. I don't usually read long threads all the way through, but this is great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost4words
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
104. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tace
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
106. Tandalayo_Scheisskopf For President! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Sat Apr-14-07 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
111. they are counting on the public's ignorance of things technical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Sun Apr-15-07 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
113. morning kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Mon Apr-16-07 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
116. republicons lying to the people of America. Again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC