|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 03:51 PM Original message |
(Goodling's) Lawyer to Dems: No No No No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. a Justice Department official...Justice mind you...a Justice Dept. official pleading the Fifth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Congress is going to have to be firm with her and her attorney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. This is a JUSTICE Department employee saying that if she tells the truth IT WILL BE A CRIME.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InternalDialogue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I second that second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. 100% accurate. She can't plead the 5th to a question she hasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. She needs to appear and be forced to formally take the 5th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt-60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Send over the Capital Police to collect her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Just grant her immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. then put her in JAIL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. Bad framing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. Don't back down now, don't even THINK about backing down; we need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. ok nowi am confused..can she not be called and asked about others behaviour?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I'm not a lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Actually, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. yes, if she refuses to come voluntarily she can be subpeonaed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. Time for the waterboard and genital electrodes (which aren't torture, right Al?). . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. Give her immunity and make her sing sing sing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Not That Low Level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redacted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. You really think so Demeter? About Condi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 06:03 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Good Point! SheApparently Had More Power Than Condi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Counsel to the AG is now a Cabinet-level position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redacted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Thanks Bake Esq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A Simple Game (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. I don't see anyone trying to discard the constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhilipShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Congress should have a special prosecutor appointed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. That idea has been floated; here's a link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. if the Justice Dept failed to cooperate with the American people, then what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncteechur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
21. I need to see a PERP FUCKING WALK!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
23. In case you missed her picture when I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
27. I am thinking that the McNulty allegation needs to be investigated. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
31. The 5th Amendment was never meant as a means of avoiding testimony altogether. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
32. she must know some really juicy shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-05-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I'm sure she does know a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 23rd 2024, 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC