|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:53 PM Original message |
Poll question: Would Hillary have voted for war if her daughter's life was on the line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. I vote maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. She didn't vote for war...your poll is a POS...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Byrd says she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
57. In the excerpt you posted Byrd did NOT say IWR was a vote for war - he said that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Really hard to erase a public record! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Which you have apparently not read...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Read the text of the resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Read Hillary's statement...and the first clause of the IWR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Yes, he did...but what thinking person DIDN'T know ahead of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Indeed. What kind of person trusts a man who stole his way into office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. I could care less what spin she gives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Now you are spinning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. So... it doesn't matter that more people didn't vote against * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #34 |
60. Section 2 is nothing but hot air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Section 3... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. That's still very flexible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #71 |
77. But she did nothing to limit the scope of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #63 |
75. Section 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
62. Now you're spinning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Clause 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. How about she could have shown some principles for a change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. There was more than one principle involved... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:11 AM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Totally groundless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:31 AM Response to Reply #73 |
82. They voted for "principles" that were not in the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
79. Bush did not violate the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #62 |
69. You said it. The IWR was undemocratic to its core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Your denial of reality is downright Bushian. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Actually your refusal to look at actual evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Ah...ad hominem attacks invoking Wal Mart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Ah..take a look at the posters previous thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Your idiotic anti-Hillary crusade is downright Limbaughian. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I don't think it's idiotic. I think Hillary is an opportunistic hypocrite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. I doubt that Limbaugh supports Mike Gravel. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Yeah...she sort of did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. She really didn't...and made that clear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. The only statement that really matters was her vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That is simply not true...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. How is it not? She cast the vote. Half of this country and most of the world knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. You are mistaken... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. What does war experience (in the 1960s) have to do with knowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Quotes from IWR opponents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Good reading, but the fact that others felt the same way doesn't make it right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. The IWR vote took place 18 months into the Bush Presidency... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think this question is a relevant to ask of all our representatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. They are all in the spotlight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why gang up on a democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. Under the same conditions as her previous vote I say yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. Would John Edwards have voted the way he did if Cate's life was on the line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Good question. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Because Edwards doesn't play the games Hillary does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I disagree. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A Simple Game (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. So Edwards is for the war, and Hillary is against it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
47. Edwards is Sticking to the Clinton Playbook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. Let's throw hate darts at the democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. One after another. It is so old and predictable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. "She voted for the war" is a Republican talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Actually, it's an Antiwar Activist talking point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
59. Deleted message |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
72. It was clear to many of us that invading Iraq would be a huge mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
24. God, I'm getting so sick of the hate Hillary b.s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. I don't hate Hillary...I just want some of these Kool-Aid drinkers to wake up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #37 |
53. Deleted message |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. Interesting reply you received. Who posted this? Is there one doubling up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
58. I wonder why these so called "Dems" bash Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A Simple Game (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
26. Did Hillary do something to you personally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. What's done is done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-10-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Then why doesn't Hillary support defunding this immoral debacle? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Because she cares about troops W put in harms way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdrube (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Defunding won't hurt the troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #43 |
56. Deleted message |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #43 |
78. Bush is in charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
49. OP is out of line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
52. Hey, Clarkie, if Hillary becomes President are you gonna be pissed or what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Rarely do we agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #52 |
64. I don't care about Clarkie1 but flush this thread.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
74. I think that this is a fair question for anyone voting to send our young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
83. Hillary voted in popular fashion , how many did vote against the war? 2-3?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-11-07 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
84. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 25th 2024, 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC