|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:37 PM Original message |
They are not going to let Lieberman lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Funny, Clinton was on TV throughout 2003 and 4 always careful to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. His hold on the party is being threatened by the upstarts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliss
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. "It's about the war" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
76. The K/E money leftover was closer to $15 million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:34 PM Response to Reply #76 |
108. Let me find it, there was a complete rundown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #76 |
112. Aha, CNN changed their totals from the previously posted article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ray of light
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. lol--office space (the movie!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. CNN made a 48,420,000 error, glad they fixed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #116 |
124. If I were suspicious of CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #112 |
123. Thanks again - that makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 05:28 PM Response to Reply #112 |
153. CNN did it on purpose to foster backlash against Kerry. The corpmedia are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #76 |
117. karynnj, watch out in case anyone else quoted CNN on the original |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #117 |
122. Thanks for the heads up - I need to find a good link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 03:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
136. No ome gets a free ride bill..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
75. Very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Twelve more days. They've called in the big guns, but Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. I hope you are right, but there has not been time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:30 AM Response to Reply #14 |
77. I see what you are saying, but there is hope. Look at 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 08:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. I think you might have it exactly right -- especially on the second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Hi, JerseygirlCT. Nice to see you again on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:33 AM Response to Reply #26 |
79. I do remember that NH remark - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
92. It is The Most Arrogant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #92 |
107. I don't even mind the Clintons so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #107 |
120. Good point about Wicker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #120 |
128. I remember those sleeping bear commercials very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 04:33 AM Response to Reply #120 |
138. Ironically, what won Lieberman the 1988 election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
53. Eventually, there's a cabinet seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #53 |
93. Who are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #93 |
101. This is my polite way of telling Joe not to stink up the joint by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #101 |
121. Oh, nicely put! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Very disgusting, VERY! Are they going to use Diebold to seal the vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
54. As I've said before on DU, We don't use Diebold in CT. (yet) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buff2
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. I am so disappointed in Clinton for supporting Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Because it was never personal, merely political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
33. Yeah, like in "The Godfather." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #33 |
90. DINGDINGDINGDING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. strange, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Because he knows it ain't about Right or Left, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDem06
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 09:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. Ummm Greyhound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 03:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
125. So what's your point? I am aware that the number of have-nots in, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #125 |
149. I don't agree. Lamont has a varied family background. His great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Jul-29-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #149 |
154. I sincerely hope that you are right. Since I don't live in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
39. It's about maintaining the power status quo, not so much about personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ms liberty
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 08:07 AM Response to Reply #39 |
83. Very cogent post there, Raster... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:24 PM Response to Reply #83 |
105. thank youl. perhaps I shall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #39 |
96. Exatamundo! And BC thinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #96 |
126. and why not, he's fooled them for decades. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
94. Cause he's doin' that "triangulation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. I honestly think that if most people believe that the war is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. If Lieberman wins the primary, does it follow that he will win the race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes. If he wins the primary, he's in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 08:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. OK, but not OK at least its not an R. (for the numbers toward control) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Whichever wins the primary, almost certainly, wins the seat. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Yes, absolutely. I think there's still a very good chance that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 10:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. If Lieberman wins the primary, I'm voting Green. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:31 AM Response to Reply #34 |
57. I don't think there is a "Green" on the ballot in this primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:45 AM Response to Reply #57 |
72. Not in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #72 |
106. Thanks for that info! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Look, we must believe in Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 10:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
35. I've been doing volunteer work for the Lamont campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #35 |
95. May I thank you, personally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynzM
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #35 |
99. Same here, dude! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. NAFTA, Welfare Reform, Globalization, Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. To name a few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Eight years of peace and prosperity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
65. Not for everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
62. How soon they forget. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Knight
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
89. That's all well and good but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #89 |
129. Don't forget the Telecommunications Act of 1996. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 03:53 PM Response to Reply #129 |
148. Yep Bill was great regulator, wasn't he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
36. I think history will remember Clinton as a good president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
97. bush set the bar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xynthee
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
127. Don't forget about DoMA!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think it's too late... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I hope you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. Kos has a good take on this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Sounds like Kos wants a pure forfeit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Lieberman is not spending his millions.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Kos needs to realize it's not as simple as winning the Montana primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. It's probably my sports background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:38 AM Response to Reply #51 |
59. I can understand his tone most times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #45 |
109. I don't think it's about the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #19 |
98. Turnout, Turnout, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. I understand that Clinton put a condition on his support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. That's a theory, but there is no proof that I've seen. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
70. If that's true then I'm OK with what Clinton is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DYouth
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. I've been thinking that very thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yawn. Clinton still around? How's WTO-NAFTA working for us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sleipnir
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benny05
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
27. Of Course Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
38. Uhm.. regular people still vote in primaries, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
41. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
42. Clinton made it clear to Lieberman he will support Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Not under those circumstances, no. Anything else, all bets are off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Oh, come one. Vilifying? Who vilified? I didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:21 AM Response to Reply #48 |
63. psssst:: I didn't say you did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #42 |
50. Clinton can then go on record as stating he no longer supports Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #50 |
64. Yep, and those will be good times indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:56 AM Response to Reply #50 |
81. The problem is that theprimary election endorsement still exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
46. Why can't Clinton campaign for whomever he wants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Jul-26-06 11:52 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. It's not cheating. I never said it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:04 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. yes, you never said it was cheating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Well, in a way I do look at it like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reckon
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
52. We're learning just how far right the Dem party has moved.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
55. I not sure about this one, I was pretty upset until I heard Clinton's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Don't !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 08:19 AM Response to Reply #55 |
85. Yeah -besides, how many incumbants need x-prez level help in a *primary* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
58. DINO!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caria
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
61. Bill Clinton called me tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrary1
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
66. Look how this Repub is spinning it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 03:04 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:51 AM Response to Reply #67 |
74. McCain putting principle before party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:52 PM Response to Reply #74 |
132. I was thinking global warming, campaign finance reform, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 08:03 AM Response to Reply #67 |
82. My first thought was the same as yours - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
144. It shouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 08:09 AM Response to Reply #66 |
84. Oh, I so hope the Democrats Lose! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
133. And the GOP only wants what's best for the Dems of CT. Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
68. It's it up to the real CT Dems to TURN OUT on the day of the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
69. At the risk of getting attacked, I think the Democrats are trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 08:56 AM Response to Reply #69 |
86. I think the percent of self described Jewish leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #86 |
100. How awful. I suspected as much. Thanks for sharing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itzamirakul
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #86 |
146. karynnj, are there a great number of dual citizenships in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itzamirakul
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
145. You might be interested in reading the Mearsheimer/Walt paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
71. Is this what it will take to convince Dems that Bill Clinton is an asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
73. Both on TV and Radio, I hear mostly Lamont ads. NESN has had only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
78. I am not a Connecticut voter, yet I am greatly anxious for Ned Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RangerSmith
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
80. No matter who we are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 05:01 AM Response to Reply #80 |
139. Here's an excellent resource: Vote Out Incumbents Democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
87. Clinton was all over the place in 1994 and we lost both chambers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:06 PM Response to Reply #87 |
103. You are right. We did lose then. Also 02 and 04. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #103 |
142. Lamont will win, I predict 58%-42% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 05:22 PM Response to Reply #87 |
151. No he wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
88. K&R-- excellent analysis.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
91. This is a power struggle in the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #91 |
104. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. I agree there are overtones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
western mass
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 04:21 AM Response to Reply #104 |
137. Showing loyalty to a senator as disloyal as Joe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 12:27 PM Response to Reply #137 |
143. loyalty is in the eye of the beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
102. Lieberman has always been a front man for the defense industry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #102 |
111. I'll be damned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 05:03 AM Response to Reply #102 |
140. And we know The Defense Industry is presently "Making a Killing" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #102 |
152. Always good to hear from you, good sir! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ray of light
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
113. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
118. "they"? I thought it was up to the voters in CT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
119. "They" are the problem, afterall so it seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #119 |
150. It could be worse, you know. We just have to suck it up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Singular73
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
130. No no no no no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin
![]() |
Thu Jul-27-06 10:49 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Lieberman "has the best chance of winning?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 06:02 AM Response to Reply #130 |
141. No, that's not it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
134. It's about money and nothing more. the whole fucking world... so sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #134 |
135. We're trying to change that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Jul-28-06 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
147. If he does win- and I don't think he will that's the last nail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC