|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
genius
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:02 PM Original message |
Proof that Bush wore device in debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogradda
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. where is that second photo from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogradda
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. i took it off the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. What's funny is that Drudge thinks it's photoshopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
46. Incapable of capturing a shot from the debate video, is he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Longhorn
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just right click on the photo, then click on "properties" to get the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. This would have never been an issue if the freepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. Yes, very true. Ironic, isn't it?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
53. That's classic Rove: accuse th other guy of doing what you are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UCLA Dem
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
58. oh, the irony!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shockingelk
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. can anyone answer these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ripley
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. No, because this is a wild goose chase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. It's worked its way into the MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Believe it or not Ripley..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
35. Isn't it a bit odd that Bush demanded no back-view cameras? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RollergirlVT
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Ah but it is not the belief.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
39. Angles and shadows may account for many things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. I'm happy to defer to the experts here who have used equipment like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. That's not "proof" of anything "genius" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard D
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. My thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. OMG. Are you kidding me??? They can get the new stuff off the net. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Only a "lame dumb ass" would use a direct radio link..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. It wasn't ridiculed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Actually, if you knew what you were talking about..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. What ridicule our way ? ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
56. Although I don't like your tone, I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrBB
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
9. Der Spiegel has yet another view of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
47. Yeah, I second that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrBB
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:23 AM Response to Reply #47 |
59. "Questions have been raised!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UCLA Dem
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:25 AM Response to Reply #47 |
62. me too!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio-Active
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think it's much more likely Bush used a cheatsheet in Debate #1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. just about everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:12 AM Response to Reply #13 |
52. So cool, he works so haard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lookaround
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh dear. How I wish there WERE proof! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It's not a wrinkle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Hi lookaround!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat in Tallahassee
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Who needs proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. Not any proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:06 AM Response to Reply #28 |
48. That's right...show me the proof there isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
54. But Kerry can speak English |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. Can't they do a security screening on Bush and Kerry as they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maat
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Now, I don't know what you guys think about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yes. Your husband is right. This is all dumb conspiracy BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Once again I see you resorting to name calling..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelYell
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Serious dumb question time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:24 AM Response to Reply #30 |
60. Absolutely....if they KNOW he's got a vest on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
49. bush won't get a medical examine And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shivaji
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
24. Y'all wrong! It was a bomb * had strapped to his body in case he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bagnana
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RunningFromCongress
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. There's no wire to the ear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 09:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Not Necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrBB
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Are Dems too dumb to live? I gotta wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RunningFromCongress
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. I still think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
50. I want their "reality" to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. Best photo yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. ROFL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:10 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Classic bushit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Mon Oct-11-04 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
44. my personal theory is that the reason he did so poorly in debate one.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clover
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
55. still lacking GOP explanation, a kinder theory: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:24 AM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Very good points clover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UCLA Dem
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
57. nice!! keep it going!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Tue Oct-12-04 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
63. There are still many questions to be asked about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC