|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 02:59 PM Original message |
Four Basic, Major Assumptions that Supporters of the Official 9/11 Story Have to Make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Number 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Actually on point 1, any assertion about "al qaeda" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. where are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. In reality, it could be just two or three people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. we're still waiting for you to link to any... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Your claims are goofy, der. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hoi_polloi (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. that is very believable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Ha-hah! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. They could truthfully claim that isn't what they do here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. ''truther logic'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Your claims are the ones that are goofy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 06:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Why do you assume that we don't work both sides of the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 09:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. There aren't "two sides" of the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
58. Some of your fellow Truthers must be disinfo agents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Simple. Spooked911 is intelligent and sincere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. But a good disinfo agent would have to appear that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
48. That would explain why truthers seem so delusional. You guys are GOOD. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. So far, not one of them has said they are here defending the OCT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Speaking for myself (although I believe most agree) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Two hours later and STILL not one of 'em will say they're here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Two hours later and you're still wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. My prediction is still correct. See Post #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 06:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Nearly 12 hours later and still, you're wrong - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Nearly 8 years later and you've yet to prove the OCT is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Youv'e done nothing of the sort, Not even close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I predict that "lared" will never even attempt to defend the OCT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. That's quite odd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
57. I admitted to the crime you've accused me of and you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. You are the one that is goofy because you believe in the OCT. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #25 |
65. maybe people have a life on the weekends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. That's what enables those defenders of the OCT to go on and on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 12:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:29 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Spooked911 Believes It Is Obvious That Nukes Blew Up The Towers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. Twelve major assumption that supporters of MIHOP theories have to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
27. The assumptions you have to make to support the OCT are the first test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 04:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
54. No, it does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
22. Which is completely irrelevant when analyzing the goofy pseudo science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. His OP IS 100% correct. If it wasn't, your response would be very.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. If I recall correctly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Yes, the OCT is based on a foundational lie: Olson's calls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Do you realize you didn't rebut anything? You merely repeated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:30 AM Original message |
Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
36. No proof of phone calls from Olson on FL77, ergo OCT is a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Dude...you keep trying to skirt a very important fact... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I'm aware that others supposedly claimed that planes were hijacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. And you leave out the part where a number of them stated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Please cite the observances of box cutters and/or knives besides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Gladly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. What truly baffles me about you is that you actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Dude...seriously, if you knew about them, you wouldn't have asked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 09:05 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. You demanded to know about any other passengers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #71 |
80. ...duder... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Then why would you ask such a stupid question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Of for fucks sake! I was merely playing on yours and your cohorts' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. No, you weren't, dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. It's your claims that are goofy, duder. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Of course they're not "professional disinformation agents". It's readily apparent that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
44. Deleted message |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. He can't provide evidence that she actually made that call. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. No...YOUR claims are goofy. Anyone who believes in the pack of lies that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. neener neener |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Which you have brilliantly done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. Deleted message |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
53. 'I don't know if anyone takes you seriously enough to engage in such a monumental |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. The OCT, in which you believe, as well as the laughable NIST report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 05:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. Well, then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. What laughable about it? Ummmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 08:16 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Have you even read the NIST reports? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. I think you're actually misstating your own position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Of course planes hit the towers. I just don't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. "fire... melted the steel structure, initiating the collapse of all three buildings." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Semantics and a little lack of detail on my part (since it's been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. "a little lack of detail on my part" = straw man argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
88. We await a substantive discussion with anticipation. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
86. "Of course planes hit the towers." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #39 |
68. I didn't think it was possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. And where, pray tell, can I find the 'substance and content' in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. your sticks and stones are goofy dude (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Your lack of "substance and content" is now well established. Good day. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Your Irony is now well established. Good day. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. delete. moved. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
79. Hence the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aldo (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-18-09 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
87. Well, they can believe 12 impossible thing before breakfast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 03rd 2024, 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC