|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
spooked911
![]() |
Sat Dec-13-08 08:34 AM Original message |
CGI Plane Insert? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-13-08 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. This reminds me of a recently coined 9/11 maxim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
211. QFT n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Sat Dec-13-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. You are seriously suggesting that the second tower was not hit by a plane? seriously??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. Yeah....U got a problem with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Dec-13-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Gotta love U anonymouse internet eye-witnesses..so authentic n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
40. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. If you get a typical reply it will go something like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Answers on that vary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Indeed: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Where was your mother in relation to the WTC? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. You have already made clear your belief I am a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. If I am so debunkable......why not just tell me where was your mother on 9/11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. It's not that you're debunkable but that you are disagreeable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. U put me in a catch 22 situation....I will get banned if I call U a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Are you aware that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. And are you aware that witnesses saw planes like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Interestingly you have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Ok..lets look at those who saw the plane hit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. I don't have to concentrate on anonymous witnesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. See post 24 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. Are you even reading my posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. We can go round in circles n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Then you are not going to answer my questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. I don't what to get banned. thank you n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. From my post #40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. Ok.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 07:41 AM Response to Reply #84 |
165. ok, I'll try to post this again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:36 AM Response to Reply #165 |
171. Thanks for responding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #48 |
172. What's even more insidious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sat Dec-13-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. The whole video is a fake. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-14-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Maybe the plane was not faked, but was vaporized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-14-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Not the DEW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-14-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Perhaps this is similiar to the Lasaga Cell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-14-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Yes, who would have noticed bulk shipments of table salt to the Twin Towers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. fake Planes/ meteors hitting the wtc were part of the american cultural psyche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
174. "the american cultural psyche" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #174 |
180. If the islamists hated the USA so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #180 |
183. KISS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #183 |
184. You contradict yourself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #184 |
188. Pot-kettle-black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #188 |
193. You are speaking gobledegook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #193 |
197. To you perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #197 |
200. CIA and the mujahadeen were intertwined to the tune of Billions of $ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #200 |
206. That page is gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 08:10 AM Response to Reply #206 |
207. Yeah...I know that story backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 08:27 AM Response to Reply #207 |
209. The Japanese (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #209 |
210. True..But the japanese did not use UAV packed with explosives! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #210 |
221. No they used a MAV packed with explosives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #221 |
223. Ok...thanks for info. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
173. Even more insidous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Sun Dec-14-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Now that was thoughtful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Just to remind people how much **** you have peddled down the years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
87. Wow you dug that up again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:35 AM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Yep...it is...(a big deal)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:40 AM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Did you ever consider that in the 20 intervening months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #100 |
107. And what did you check... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #92 |
109. Wow, that's some bad math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Let's discuss LARED's math... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. You're assuming numbers meant the same thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Actually YOU are assuming that you can challenge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Yeah, nobody cares about your "find". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. Your fact checking seems every bit as accurate as LARED's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. I don't know what you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Let me talk slowly here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Failed to be candid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. No, actually he did not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. Hmmm. Not how I read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. So if LARED said his eyewitnesses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Four is pretty close to two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. And appearently.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Twelve? Twenty-four? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Yet in his first account... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. You can count to over one million using your fingers and toes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #125 |
135. Dude, please keep in mind you are a no planer/ fake plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #120 |
136. Thanks nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #119 |
133. The witnesses did not disappear. I was not there and was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #119 |
134. The pressure is too much, I've cracked under the bright lights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #114 |
132. It ok, they have so little actual evidence the trival takes on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thorandmjolnir
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #114 |
178. Actually, I care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #112 |
131. Huh oh you booked marked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #92 |
163. What a fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:21 AM Response to Reply #87 |
98. DU posters like U have a habit of changing your testimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Let me repeat myself and add |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:48 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. You forgot to add that witnesses lie....9/11 is a classic example n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:49 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. So do CT'ers ...... 9/11 is a classic example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Simple question...did your friends see the plane approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #105 |
122. No, they were on roof top of a building on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Oh my god! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #124 |
164. I found something even better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Dec-16-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. It's caused by the slow motion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Tue Dec-16-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Once again, ignorance of video tech. Sort of 'stonishing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue Dec-16-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Dec-16-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Wait until there's more footage from this camera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Tue Dec-16-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Rational reason for missing plane parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 06:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. How does this information affect your belief in pods? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
80. No-plane fakery reaffirms the evidence for pods on real planes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #80 |
88. I'm suggesting there is no pod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:17 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. So you are a no-pod theorist - got any evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #91 |
104. You want evidence for no - pods??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. The plane parts are not really "missing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Faking planes is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. possible, but not necessary and not sufficient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Thats fair enough....just keep an open mind and its cool n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. What type of plane do they show? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. Excuse me, but your pod is showing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Thanks for the trip through memory lane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. The truth remains true forever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Spend some time in the archives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Spend some time updating your script |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. You're a little too late |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dlaliberte
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. 20 January? Too late? What are you predicting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:24 AM Response to Reply #90 |
95. Without hatred for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Fri Dec-26-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #95 |
229. Luc Courchesne, who made this video, is a low-level conspirator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. LMAO! Ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. shit fuck No-planers like Fred want U 2 think they don't know what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. (That's what you think) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:38 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Funny thing is U take him seriously...he wants U 2 debunk him.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. For a while now, I've thought it's not a matter of "planes/no planes," but rather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scrinmaster
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Show me plane wreckage that didn't match commercial jets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I misspoke--the engine parts found were not consistent with a 767, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. "One doesn't need to be a jet engine expert ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 06:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
38. True-- but why can't we have an expert in these engines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. How many have you contacted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
82. I contacted a few people at a company I found that services these engines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. Because then all you would say is that the conspirators knew enough to plant the right parts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #49 |
81. you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. let me clarify-- I *am* open to new evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
94. Got any data... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
26. Do you expect it to bounce off the side of the building?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. No....just enter the building more realistically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. How do you know what it looked like after it entered the building? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:42 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I would have expected some oscillation of the wings: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:57 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Oscillation? How much oscillation would you expect in 1/10th of a second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 04:38 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Typical....you hide behind the speed factor and ignore the physics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. The plane went straight into the building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. So how could the wings enter the building within 3 frames of video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. That looks like the Controlled Impact Demonstration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. i take your point.....but wings are fragile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Well, "fragile" is a relative term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. They can be shorn through and sheered off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. That's the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. The wings are already partially in the wall: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I'm not really sure where the fuel tanks are in the wings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. This gif shows the entrance.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Also, wings hold up those massive engines when the plane is on the ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. But wings can be perforated: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #60 |
85. You provided no links to your pictures there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:15 AM Response to Reply #85 |
97. More fuel means more chance of it igniting.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #97 |
108. More fuel meant more support for the structure of the wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. It doesn't matter if the spark is there if the fuel isn't exposed yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #115 |
139. But the tanks are exposed....the wings are being cut by the steel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. You still haven't provided links to information about those other crashes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. So you are not going to ignore me then! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #145 |
154. I didn't say I was going to put you on Ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:23 AM Response to Reply #154 |
169. But will NEVER ignore you.It's my duty. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #139 |
144. No, no, you've got it all wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. LOL! I never said it ignited in the tanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. The one you showed earlier was before the wings made contact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #147 |
149. A plausible explanation that maybe the view of the ignition is blocked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. You mean we SAW a burst of light (whatever it was) when the cockpit hit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #150 |
151. I respect your hypothesis and I believe it is the only explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. That's cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:26 AM Response to Reply #152 |
170. Well iam certain that Flight 175's did not ignite when they should have done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #139 |
175. It takes more than the fuel tanks to be ruptured for an explosion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #175 |
179. The circumstances were already conducive for an explosion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #179 |
187. Not quite that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #187 |
190. Ok....a reasonable hypothesis.....but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. Your opinion about it doesn't matter here. A liquid provides support for the container it's in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #116 |
140. In other words....you have no rebutal...ignorance is bliss huh? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. Sorry, ball's in your court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #142 |
148. You wanna spam....its all you got left...and it ain't enough to save you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #148 |
155. "Yet on 9/11...ruptured fuel tanks do not explode" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. I am not talking about the plane once it is completely inside the building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #158 |
159. Every other plane crash features an instaneouse explosion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. Almost immediately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:04 AM Response to Reply #160 |
166. No that's your problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #166 |
181. You still didn't provide links to other information about your second plane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #181 |
185. I provided links to the videos...and I am sure U can count n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scrinmaster
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:37 AM Response to Reply #60 |
93. Those aircraft were probably traveling much slower than the airliners that hit the WTC and Pentagon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Steel will always sheer through the wings..no matter what the speed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #96 |
103. LOL - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. The only thing which is Dumb is the shit that U believe in.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #106 |
137. According to your logic it is impossible for water to cut steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #137 |
143. Pathetic analogy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #143 |
153. You're right it was a lousy analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #153 |
156. How bout hitting a steel post with an an aluminium pipe LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #156 |
161. No nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #161 |
167. Then tell that to purdue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #167 |
212. A largely horizontal impact at lower speed works differently... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #212 |
213. Make a proper comparison: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #156 |
162. You persist in repeating that logical fallacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #162 |
168. The fallacy is yours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #168 |
176. You've got to be kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #176 |
177. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #177 |
182. You have some nerve asking for links when you refuse to provide them yourself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #182 |
186. Yawn...is this the best that DU's 9/11 debukah's have to offer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #186 |
191. No links for you until you produce the links you've been asked for previously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #191 |
194. Bolo...stop describing yourself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #194 |
195. More evasions from seat. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #195 |
196. Just saying it does not make it true Bolo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #196 |
198. No, but the facts bear me out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #198 |
201. Keep waiting..whilst I bludgeon U with more doses of real plane crashes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #177 |
189. "fine particulates". ROFL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #189 |
192. No wonder you believe in the plane videos...U can't see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #177 |
214. Jeeeez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #214 |
219. I am not denying that there was plane debris... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #177 |
216. And BTW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 10:52 AM Response to Reply #216 |
218. Dont be shy Seagar...show people a larger picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #218 |
220. You need ot look up the "rule of holes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #220 |
222. I'm more than glad to show people what U don't want them to see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vroomfondel
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
138. This video looks fake to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #138 |
199. Time for this hideously malformed thread to die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #199 |
202. Probably cos your group have had an ass-kicking n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #202 |
203. I don't think endlessly repeating BS counts as kicking ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. Thats why your side has not kicked any! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #204 |
205. Wow. I bet you came up with that all by yourself too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #205 |
208. But this witness did not see the plane that you claim exists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #208 |
215. Wow. "He would have seen this plane..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #215 |
217. He was looking up..i emailed and asked him..I suggest you do the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #217 |
224. Okay....if you e-mailed him..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #224 |
225. I have posted his email address-can U read? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #225 |
226. Sorry...I overlooked the e-mail address, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #226 |
227. You did...that was quick ! LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone
![]() |
Wed Dec-24-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
228. Uh, guys? Things SHEAR off airplanes upon impact, not SHEER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC