|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
T_i_B
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:50 AM Original message |
Studies debunk 9/11 myths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. So, what does NIST and the State Department say about WTC7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T_i_B
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well here is the National Institute of Standards and Technology website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I can find neither report.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. Uh... look harder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
42. And here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. You still trust the State Department after the whole Colin Powell U.N. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pooja
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. I think it is odd that there has never been an independant investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Patriot Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Depends on which DEM wins the White House. Feingold would probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Not too good then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Oversight, oversight, oversight! Build in lots of oversight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. Putting aside CD theories, what about the money trail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Money Trail to Pakistan yes...USG...prove it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Hey, TAM, if you go to the bottom of this post you will find lots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Thanks, the links are fine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Check out the Guardian piece I posted. It alledges the USG is actively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. More money came from Saudis than anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Here's stories from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Try that logic on any other organized crime case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. So where do you stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Why hasn't the USG attempted to extradited and put him on trial for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. One answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Is that why they let Osama escape too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:57 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. geopolitics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. So dealing with him "quietly" means letting him retire? Or do you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 03:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Some Solid sources for the transfer claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Here's from my post up thread: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. solid sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Good points about Paul Thompson's sources, RedSock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. The sources are fine.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Sorry about that. Here they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Times of India |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I didn't give you the Times of India, but that;s ok. I gave you cnn and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. another linker gave it to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Sorry to seem so harsh...but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:41 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Yeah, it's funny this stuff is so hard to find in the Big Corporate Media, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. So far.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. You may have mis-read the WSJ bit, because it's sourced by the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:40 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Look Closer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Yes, you are correct. I also missed the colon after the first paragraph. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:43 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. It's a pretty well-established fact - oops I think I doubled down on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:49 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. 2 out of 3 working...thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. I swear the Archive.org one was working when I posted it a short while ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:47 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. the evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 06:54 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Fair enough - it's in the Op Ed pages anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. gotta keep up appearances (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. TAM, that is a damn good question. I think the USG, is an overstatement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. More to the point, why hasn't the USG indicted Mahmoud and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TAM
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I did answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:49 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Just saw it and replied. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:57 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Has any one, anywhere actually been called to account for this $h!t? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. 9/11 criminal law approach v. civil law approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 12:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. I'm inclined to think Gen. Ahmad was a hostage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. "Obviously in breakfasting at the Capitol..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 02:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. It's just an idea that popped into my head one day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Did you consider that Gen. Ahmad may have been set up? If he was, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 05:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. You mean set up to be a fall guy if necessary, and he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 07:17 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. Define "hostage" & then I can say if I agree or not. Re: Bush & Card... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. The basis is the hypothesis that what Andrew Card |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Based on that definition, then no, I don't agree that President Bush was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. As Michael Moore pointed out, Bush had plenty of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. In your "setup"- wondering scenario, who might have set him up? EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. I'm not saying anybody did or would have. I'm saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. If anyone felt they'd been set up that day, wouldn't OBL be a better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Yeah,OBL is a good candidate for having been set up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. You've confused me but I don't think it's intentional. I'm not even sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Sep-04-06 04:14 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. It's confusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Don't forget Bob Graham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
33. Sorry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
22. and numerous reports from Dick Cheney and George Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Mmmm... Dewars with ice, and a spritz of fizzy water - no lime please n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
38. Where are these "two official reports published last week"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly
![]() |
Sun Sep-03-06 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
40. two OFFICIAL studies, lol.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC