|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 03:24 PM Original message |
What other rights would you have us make up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taitertots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. The whole constitution was made up n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. The right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Face it. Its a right to own a toy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. If that's what you believe then go about trying to repeal it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Engage your brain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. You really do need to read SCOTUS on D.C. v. Heller and Amici for Respondents & Petitioner. You have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I read it a while ago. About 1000 cases ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. And yet you haven't addressed a word of it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 07:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I wasn't paid to read it. Sorry. I'll have to read it again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. 1000 cases in ten months? N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 09:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Yes. I'm a lawyer. With access to Westlaw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 08:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. If you read Heller then you are either maliciously making false statements or you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 09:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Or give it a rest. Jeez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:08 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. You should follow your own advice and "give it a rest. Jeez." You accomplish nothing by posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Watch that SCOTUS decision get limited as time passes, BTW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. RE "SCOTUS decision get limited". Understand but IMO the question posed by SCOTUS was so narrow and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. wow, not a bad argument from a third grader ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. From your posts one might conclude you speak from current experience. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. well, your attack on the Lawyer was personal, and not issue related. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Sorry, the post was "I read it a while ago. About 1000 cases ago." My reply challenged the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I'm not an expert on Second Amendment law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. "bankruptcy lawyer"! You guys are the only ones with a growing clientele. Regarding the 2nd, some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. I would expand private property rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. In regards to eminent domain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 09:19 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I could go for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBluenoser (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. To a certain degree I agree with FireMedicDave... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. I agree, in New Jersey where the city used eminent domain and then gave the property.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
21. Your question is stupid especially from a lawyer, MrPerson - All rights already exist, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. SCOTUS addressed the issue in Heller and only a person who is comprehension-challenged can fail to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Yet people still question the right to privacy stated in Griswold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
31. Right to privacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Funny you should mention that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 23rd 2024, 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC