|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy |
![]() |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 12:44 PM Original message |
The newest rip off in housing. |
Refresh | +26 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't know how a present owner can burden a future owner with a 1% fee to the builder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. any seller can put a covenant into the contract and refuse to sell unless the buyer agrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. It is written into the builder's contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. How about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
whopis01
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 02:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. My guess would be that the original buyer has a contract with the builder that obligates them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jtuck004
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. No. You obligated yourself to this when you purchased the property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Who will see to it that this is banned by Federal Action? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jtuck004
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. If enough citizens would raise a ruckus about it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. No need to ban it (and possibly no ability to), but all you need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Not to beat a dead horse, but . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Covenants run with the land, not the building. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
louis-t
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. I will watch for this in my business, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yet another reason not to buy new housing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tech9413
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I've only bought a few properties in my 57 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Not for lightweights, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wow just when you thought you had seen it all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Whadda ya want to bet car dealers are eyeing this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Crazy Dave
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. On a smaller scale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Pikers. Now, if they really want to make money, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
populistdriven
![]() |
Tue Aug-24-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. caves are natures solution to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
northernlights
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
17. well if nothing else, this should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kat45
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. Does greed know no bounds? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
CanonRay
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. No, Hell No, and Never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. This sounds like a remarkably stupid idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. That's the thing... it ISN'T a "deal killer" for many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Sun Aug-29-10 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
26. The laws regarding home ownership need a complete makeover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC