|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:43 PM Original message |
Malloy is hyperventilating over Conyers' CENSURE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. because we don't have the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. A censure won't pass without a majority either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cureautismnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:54 PM Original message |
Repugs didn't have the Senate in 1998. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
44. Yes, they did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cureautismnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. You are correct. But they couldn't get the 2/3rds majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
52. Amen!! Democrats controlled the House in 93 and 94.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because it's impossible with the repugs holding both houses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Conyers is trying to build a consensus or coalition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. CensureBush.org |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. I agree with Malloy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. will it be the end of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I'm HOPING this will just be the beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Conyers is seeking censure and an investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. i disagree, it will be terribly damaging in 2006 for Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. I have no idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imalittleteapot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. He needs Republicans on board for impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because we have to start somewhere, and censure is a good place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. There's always a first step so lets, let this be the one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. I don't believe he has the votes for Articles of Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. THANK YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Ditto that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. I'll ditto your ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Ah...makes sense! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
73. HELLO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why don't you read Conyer's statement, he explains why not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Thank You! I haven't read the report. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. because it will not work right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
46. That's not accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. AND I DISAGREE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Tell Mike to start breathing normally and f'ing read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I just emailed his producer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Did you send her the report with the relevant info highlighted? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. yes, as well as plain text just in case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. hes probably having more fun raving like a lunatic thou n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
54. Mike's "f-ing reading" this right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. yes effing do PLEASE Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. LOL, I cracked right up at the 'reparte' between Mike and Kathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmatthan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
72. Will, I sent an email to Mike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. A Surmise As To The Strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Conyers spells it out in plain language . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Thanks For That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. I may be wrong, but I got the impression that he wants to obtain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
27. Censure and not impeachment? Could Conyers be a closet DLCer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. read post 16 - especially the bold part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Oh for the luvva crumbcake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I luvva crumbcake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. You know, you have to respect Mike. I've listened to him on and off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. You should hear what he's saying about the NYT having this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:02 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. who here will call him and set him straight on Conyers? I'm too chicken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I'm too shy. Will Pitt??? He'd LOVE to hear from you Will...call him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. oh yes!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. id get into a screaming match about his DNC bashing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
33. Conyers seeks to Censure and Investigate Possible Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. I don't think he's read the report yet. Tomorrow or maybe later today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. But Conyers produced the report. I'm sure he has read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. or you can read it ALL here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
38. Impeachment is coming... this is the beginning. 110th Congress will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MallRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. Haven't yet fully laid out the case for impeachment, re: Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. High Crimes and Misdemeanors....I can't wait. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
50. Because do you really want President Cheney? Or Hastert? Stevens? Rice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Cheney is implicated. Denny Hastert? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Hmm. Ya' know, you're right. Better forget the whole thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dalloway (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
58. maybe DRAGGGGGGGING this out till 2006 isn't such a bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
60. A woman caller just mentioned DU! She supports impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. She must be a member. It sounds like she reads the board a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. She says she goes to meetups. Mike did give some love to Will! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Yes. A proud member of DU! (I'm the Patty that was just on) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Cool! You sounded great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. I heard you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:20 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. No kidding?! You were AWESOME! I could NEVER ever call his show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 11:22 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Ah shucks. . . Thanks for the positive feedback. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Her name is Patty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Hope I sounded OK. It's a bit nerve wracking n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. You sound like Rachel Maddow which is cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Funny you should mention her. She moderated an "Honest Election". . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmatthan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
71. I explained the background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC