Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark's personal lawyer (and aide) called up and heading to Jordan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 10:58 AM
Original message
Clark's personal lawyer (and aide) called up and heading to Jordan
So when did the 39th Infantry Brigade of the AK National Guard get called up, anyway? How do I find that tidbit out? Was the unit just due for activation or did this happen when someone noticed Mr. Edwards was a memeber of the unit? Things that make my tinfoil bonnet spin on my head.

<snipe> "LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark is losing his personal lawyer and campaign driver, who has been summoned to active military duty in the Middle East, possibly Iraq, campaign officials said Monday.

John C. Edwards, a lieutenant colonel in the 39th Infantry Brigade of the Arkansas National Guard, is to leave Friday for Jordan, then expects to go to Iraq "or wherever, as directed," Edwards said. Clark has sternly criticized the U.S. military action in Iraq."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21189-2003Oct13.html
also a LBN thread on this : http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=164958

What worries me is that the military has certain rights over the person of anyone in service, do they not? Like, troops have to allow samples of DNA to be taken and have whatever shots and vaccinations command feels necessary, that kind of thing. Am I right of wrong on that one?

So here we have Mr. Edwards, private attorney and campaign aide for a candidate the WH seems to have a concern with, being activated. What protects this man from being chemically induced to violating lawyer/client privledge once he is back in active duty? Am I going total tinfoil to be concerned with this?

For the record, I am neither for nor against Clark in his bid for the nomination. I am four square against the misuse of power to advance an evil agenda. When did the 39th get the call? What do they do that makes their trek to Jordan (and in all likelyhood, Iraq) a routine call up? Could a whole unit be called to active duty just so the Chicken Hawks can get their mits on Clark's lawyer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Barney Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmmmm
I don't think he will be interrogated or be "chemically induced" into providing any information about Clark, BUT. . . .

. . . I DO NOT think for a minute that it is just a coincidence that he is being called up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. This reminds me of something John Kerry said this past Sunday
One of Kerry's criticisms of Bush, and he mentioned this this past Sunday in reply to George Will, was that Bush had turned the Reserves and National Guard into regular active duty troops by the long deployments they have to endure.

I really feel sorry for LTC John C. Edwards and the troops under his command that are being taken out of jobs and careers and sent to an uncertain future and long deployment to the Iraq quagmire. I am sure that Wesley Clark is equally concerned about his friend, and that this will inspire his efforts to get rid of that idiot in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC