|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 04:30 PM Original message |
rathergate.com! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. what have you got here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 04:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Just a tip of the iceberg.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Hey George.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. Was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carla in Ca
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. I gotta tell ya...Dan Rather's ratings are up 14 points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MallRat
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Explain- where's the connection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. So.. who is "Richard Viguerie"?? edited.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carla in Ca
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. You have your thinking cap on! Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hephaistos
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 03:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
116. VIGUERIE - JACKPOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Yikes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #116 |
119. For the big picture if any don't already know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hephaistos
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. They are not the same organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:13 PM Response to Reply #116 |
128. Thomas F. Ellis? Lots of bad associations there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dark
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm not sure I understand. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. the guy who owns the site also uses the same emailing network that stone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The phonenumber is probably fake: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkrempasky
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
47. Indeed, that's not the real phone number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Mike? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:38 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Free Republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
92. HEY! IF IT IS FAKE it's a federal crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. Great find! Keep digging!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 12:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
102. Krempasky was in Florida for that recount riot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. WHOA.. LOOK AT THE DATE IT WAS CREATED!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Artemis Bunyon
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. That's 9/10, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Artemis Bunyon
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Less than 48 hours after the broadcast, well before public doubts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Fixed that date.. sorry.. oops! 9/10! That's even worse! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
34. 9/9 (see post 33) (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkrempasky
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
46. Actually, no. The term rathergate was coined on 9/9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. POLIPUNDIT.COM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. This can't be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. I need to check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. In the WHOIS there are three dates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. found it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Could this be significant? (date and time) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. What do you make of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. What do you make of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. That's what I wondered...and at "8:01" in the morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. "Rathergate" or rather "Rather'sgate" seems to go back to Sept. 9th... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #33 |
111. Extreme importance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
129. Another link in the chain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. and with this info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. starroute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:39 PM Response to Reply #135 |
139. There's an existing thread on the FEC filing -- but it's already sunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #139 |
144. Ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:28 PM Response to Reply #135 |
156. i tried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carla in Ca
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. kick keep going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Okay.. on www.rathergate.com.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
58. They just organized... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. Quickly organized.. but on whose orders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 02:11 PM Response to Reply #67 |
114. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Oops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. Mm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. I"m not the harrassing type... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Why do you say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #126 |
140. Ack! I'm sorry.. that's not what I meant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #140 |
154. No problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. Ack! I'm sorry.. that's not what I meant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
23. Keep digging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
24. Knows Roger Stone and uses his E-Mail system? This is getting good.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I just checked the email quote George listed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Can't let them get away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkrempasky
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
48. How did I know to register the domain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 06:08 AM Response to Reply #48 |
81. DO YOU KNOW ROGER STONE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:13 AM Response to Reply #48 |
82. Except that Powerline site call's it memogate..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
35. There is a Krempasky.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
53. He's on here posting on this thread.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. He is conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 12:49 PM Response to Reply #60 |
101. Krempasky was involved in Alan Keyes' campaign in 1999 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
36. His other site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
37. I have a theory as to why this scandal was "designed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Perhaps "RatherGate" (or Rather'sGate) was all set up and ready to go... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. That's what I think -- too "convenient" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. bingo ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Other birds killed with that Stone: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:57 PM Response to Reply #41 |
61. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:39 PM Response to Reply #61 |
152. Great Article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickywom
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
103. CBS was the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. How about to hide the story CBS was PLANNING TO RUN that week.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
40. Is Mikey going to play all coy and make believe he's never "met" Roger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
42. THIS is a better scandal to focus on-- |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #42 |
87. Dan....here's some info for your site. You may already have this but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #87 |
138. Mr Gorton-- |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
43. The Host |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:49 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. Chris Tyrrell -- a relative of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctyrrell
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #65 |
95. Sorry, but no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:58 PM Response to Reply #95 |
153. Why apologize? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
44. Deleted message |
Ksec
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. so when does the Easter Bunny arrive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Ummm.. Youre' NOT conservative? reeeallly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
55. Better yet.. here's a link to your blog site: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. That's not what he said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
62. What date did the possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
63. Ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
64. Ikon Public Affairs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Wish I had a year to work on this.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. this floated through here earlier today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 12:06 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. one more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:17 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. The rathergate guy works for Viguerie.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #75 |
100. You mean this bit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #66 |
105. Krempasky and Morton Blackwell's Leadership Institute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:04 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. It will take some digging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:28 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. So, have you made any connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:32 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Only that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. oh yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:33 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. A non-profile poster on FR named "ritwinger" or "ritwnger" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:19 PM Response to Reply #72 |
109. ritwnger, like Krempasky, was with the Leadership Institute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:21 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. It would be fun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Disinfopedia on Morton Blackwell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
70. I need to throw something out there to everyone..... the 2 Burketts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. and given the forged documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-04 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
76. Well I'm on the East Coast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rlev1223
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
79. Send the link to this thread.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 02:58 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. The LA Times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
83. This thread should be pinned at the top or kept bumped all day...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:38 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Its important to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:15 AM Original message |
Info from a thread I started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoleil
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
85. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
86. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:06 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #88 |
96. Seriously....this should be kicked until EVERY DUer sees it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
147. Oh, come on -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #147 |
151. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
89. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
90. sent this link info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
91. Good morning! Time to tackle this trail again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 10:02 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Morning Caliphoto! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. CornField's thread is mentioned here between post #84 & #85 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aries
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
94. Rove's M.O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
97. Our thread is getting some traction around the RW circles.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #97 |
106. I'm sure they're already here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
104. We are being summoned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:17 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. Liberals have been ridiculed and banned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 03:37 PM Response to Reply #107 |
120. Lemme guess: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Gong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Ooohhh...interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickywom
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
113. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
122. Perhaps we're barking up the wrong tree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #122 |
127. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:24 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Damn, it's like you're reading my mind! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:31 PM Response to Reply #122 |
131. It all matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:50 PM Response to Reply #132 |
143. Should we be looking more closely at American Target Advertising? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:58 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. I just sent you a PM -- I believe Judicial Watch is heavily funded by.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:15 PM Response to Reply #143 |
149. Judicial Watch seems to be the missing link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
136. Looks like our friend, Kemprasky is getting some media attention! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_S
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. This needs its own action thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 07:45 PM Response to Reply #137 |
142. Could you do that? Could you get a new thread going on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. not sure it will qualify for GD 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #137 |
148. I didn't even bother checking this thread out until now, the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
150. EXPOSE RATHERGATE.COM!! Here's how: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
155. Spammers love false registration information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. Great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #157 |
159. new thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Thu Sep-23-04 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
158. Can Lucy Ramirez be Lucia Ramirez? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC