|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:39 PM Original message |
Does anyone here HONESTLY believe that if Bill Clinton fessed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. No. If it wasn't Monica, they would have focused harder on something else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaPat
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Agree with you completely. It's amazing the GOP found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. or find 70 mill for schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theivoryqueen
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Nah - they were gunning for him from the start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Even When They Have Nothing On Him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. They had to - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DenverDem
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. Zactly.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. They just would have pounced on it and bitched and bitched and bitched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kimber Scott
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. They were gunning for him and he handed them some bullets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. One difference - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kimber Scott
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Oh, I agree with you 1000%. It was personal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I just hope that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kimber Scott
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. If they want to see him so bad, they should go fight in Iraq! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Not me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I_like_chicken
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. well technically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWizardOfMudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. I remember Orin Hatch coming out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Hi, Kathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
41. Thanks, Cat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryvov
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
48. Orin hatch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. Poppy Bush screwed around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. moreover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. He did indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:30 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. what happened to her? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. She is dead... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. with this bunch, you never know do ya! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 01:11 AM Response to Reply #14 |
75. But the Dems- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
15. He still would have been badly damaged but........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. you truly believe that, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Actually, I do believe it, and I am not young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. the only problem with your theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Sorry.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. He was impeached for perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Uh, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. one more time!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Ok... one more time for you! hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. reading is fundamental |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yeah, uh, your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
69. Hey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
71. Thanks for the link Cat Woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:44 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Deleted message |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:58 AM Response to Reply #73 |
82. You have had your ass handed to you by Catwoman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:06 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:29 AM Response to Reply #71 |
89. no she didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:52 AM Response to Reply #29 |
81. no they didn't have him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:59 AM Response to Reply #26 |
83. Actually he did but not what he was impeached for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
58. I, like many others, read the Starr report too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. I read the juicy parts back then, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
79. there was no perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. he didn't lie under oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. This is why no Bush investigations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:23 PM Original message |
that's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Not quite sure where you're coming from... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #27 |
61. WRONG.... NO, NOT THE CASE AT ALL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:38 AM Response to Reply #61 |
77. Sorry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:46 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:04 AM Response to Reply #20 |
84. I think I remember it's only perjury if it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. He handled it perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robin Hood
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. snowball. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 07:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Main Ingredient song keeps coming to mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalForEver
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
31. The repukes were out to get him and Hilary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. "their evil" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmf
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
37. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. What I want to see is - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. the only downside to his book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
40. this time, we agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
49. They went on a hunting expedition from the get go..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:03 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. I wonder how much of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
51. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brook
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
52. Couldn't agree with you more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Buwaaaahaaaahaaa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
53. I'm a hundred percent with you CW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
57. Cat_girl agrees with Cat Woman.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
59. It wouldn't have mattered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
62. Y'all are hung up on the starr rept.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
64. I think he should have said (a) MYOB and (b) I take the fifth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 10:59 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Thats the thing about Democrats.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
missedherniceguy
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
67. I am so over Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. whats to get over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neebob
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. You think Bill Clinton is doing it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:51 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. safer to say, Bush enemys are doing it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 11:32 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Well I'm not over Bill Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 01:21 AM Response to Reply #67 |
76. "our" party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:06 AM Response to Reply #67 |
86. The people that need to put Clinton behind them are republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:57 AM Response to Reply #86 |
90. I think Clinton will have the last laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
80. very well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
87. Nope.. They wanted a public flogging..and they kept sniffing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uptown ruler
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
88. Not For Second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC