|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
protect freedom impeach bush now (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:07 PM Original message |
Napalm by another name: Pentagon denial goes up in flames |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. hmm, wouldn't this be a chemical weapon, technically? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dem2dend (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Don't flame the messenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So? Should we really be destroying our respect in the world for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 09:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Figures that we didn't. Empires rarely cooperate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 11:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Oh, well then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 11:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. No, because all explosives are technically chemicals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whoYaCallinAlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Napalm in civilian areas? That would be front page news . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
protect freedom impeach bush now (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. i refer to a previous comment by US miltary...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whoYaCallinAlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I still don't see from your answer where we napalmed civilian areas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 02:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. Doesn't matter bucko. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whoYaCallinAlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 10:09 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. It's real simple bucko. I don't believe that we napalmed civilians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 10:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Look up Napalm and the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatbackSlim (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Civilian areas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. This country is being run by amoral thugs who have no qualms about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dem2dend (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. Napalm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnyCanuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. You can be damned sure if Saddam's troops had used naplam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dem2dend (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 06:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Saddam didn't need Napalm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 07:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. So tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sistersofmercy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 09:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. This is not a meritless point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 10:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. This isn't about Saddam, this is about US! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sistersofmercy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 10:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Not my point at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 11:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. You can't be serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sistersofmercy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 02:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. you got that right on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 10:03 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. here's the Iraqometer (link) which give a count...IMO, it's a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. Next they'll be telling us they don't search and destroy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-03 11:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. the article says.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. Napalm is an incendiary chemical weapon banned by UN.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-03 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
28. When you drop 2000 pound bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC