Mods: Honest question: Why did you lock Phrenzy's thread?
MadProphetMargin
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:13 AM
Original message |
Mods: Honest question: Why did you lock Phrenzy's thread? |
|
It was heated, but not exactly a flamethrower...
I was having a good time...:sad:
I was not offended. If someone else was, well, okay.
|
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Now watch as this thread is locked |
|
and moved to the ask administrators forum.
Censorship alive and well at DU?
|
everythingsxen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Threads like this always are locked... |
MadProphetMargin
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well, if that's the rules... |
mhr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:17 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Hm, Your Posts Were Some Of The Most Vitriolic Replies, Go Figure |
MadProphetMargin
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. They weren't very vitriolic. |
|
Were they? No more so than Phrenzy's. Nobody got personal, everybody attacked ideas, for the most part, rather than each other.
|
phrenzy
(941 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I tried to keep it limited to ideas, but I think in light of the fact that many here on DU have loved ones that are actually in the field I could see how the whole debate could be considered a flame.
I still think the discussion over the morality of the US Military and its conduct in GENERAL is valid for debate, but it is a very intense topic.
|
Qanisqineq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I don't consider calling |
|
95 percent of the military SCUM an idea
|
phrenzy
(941 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I tried to narrow it down to the idea of following 'immoral' orders. Which, is an unfortunate reality of being in the military.
|
MadProphetMargin
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. There are no "immoral" orders. Only "lawful" and "unlawful" orders. |
|
The nature of the military is amoral by definition.
|
phrenzy
(941 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-05-04 04:30 AM by phrenzy
That's partially my problem with the Military in general is that it seems that it attempts to absolve the individual from moral responsibility for their own actions (pulling the trigger, etc)
|
MadProphetMargin
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-04 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. There's no other way to do it. |
|
Militaries have ALWAYS been that way.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.