http://slate.msn.com/id/2109141/SLATE'S LEVIN SAID:
“Cannon's analysis doesn't jibe with Slate's exit-poll numbers. A comparison to the latest vote tallies shows Slate's final exit numbers in the paper-trail states of New Hampshire (undervalued Bush by 5 percent) and Nevada (undervalued Bush by 3 percent) were less accurate than those in Ohio (2 percent off), Florida (3 percent), and New Mexico (2 percent). The other state Cannon lists, Illinois, won't require a paper trail until 2006.”
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NH/P/00/ Kerry 340,019 50% 4
Bush(Incumbent) 330,848 49% 0
Nader 4,447 1% 0
CNN’s EXIT POLL NUMBERS TIE TO THE ABOVE
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NH/P/00/epolls.0.html Updated: 11:39 a.m.
VOTE BY GENDER BUSH KERRY NADER
TOTAL 2004 2004 2004
Male (51%) 52% 47% 0%
Female (49%) 45% 54% 1%
Now .51 times .52 plus .49 times .45 is equal to .2652 plus .2205 = 48.57%
Where does he get BUSH UNDERVALUED BY 5% versus exit poll? IT LOOKS LIKE A ZERO ERROR!
But the Slate National Election Pool exit poll numbers were indeed at 2 pm
New Hampshire
Kerry 54
Bush 44
Nader 1
What were the final Slate/ National Election Pool exit poll numbers for NH?
http://www.exit-poll.net/pool.html requires a paid admission.
Or do the final numbers blow away his comment that exit poll with no paper trail was no worse than exit poll with paper trail?