|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
RyanPsych (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 12:26 AM Original message |
GOP Resurrecting Jim Crow in Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. Germany, 1933 ........... HERE WE COME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ship of Fools (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. pardon my naivete/ignorance, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RyanPsych (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 08:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It should be illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 05:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Does that mean that absentee ballots will be banned if they are mailed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ship of Fools (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. who knows!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
6. Democrats need to challenge this in Federal court. It is a violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ship of Fools (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 11:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. cool ... i wondered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Generally in cases like this it is pretty easy to get a "stay" on the implementation of the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. It's a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-21-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Dems MUST take this up, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surrealAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. They must know that this is unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. the Supreme Court doesn't give a shit if its unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
11. Holder should be locking these people up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
999998th word (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. ALEC 'model legislation' times 22 + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 25th 2024, 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC