|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
savalez
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:07 PM Original message |
Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Marriage. What is it for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Loving v Virginia should be the core of this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savalez
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
109. Yes but it's, at its core, a privacy issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sue his ass for libel, sue him for every single penny he has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The truth is the ultimate defense for such cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If its true she can't sue for libel. I'm no lawyer but perhaps she can win a suit for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Did he have a legal obligation to protect her privacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Regardless of privacy. The libel case is quite clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. How is a libel case quite clear and that he will be taken to the cleaners? The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. He basically called her a murderer...abortion is a legal medical procedure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. No, he did not call her a murderer. If he did, I would have agreed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
61. Murderers kill people without legal authority. That is the diference.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #61 |
84. But the whole point of this billboard is this guy did not agree with the legality of the abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. From the picture below it is clear that he opposes abortion being legal. Libel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:04 AM Response to Reply #90 |
127. "shit house lawyer" LOL, projection being what it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:13 AM Response to Reply #127 |
146. It's not necessarily libel/slander to say a person killed someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. I don't agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
62. That is nice, not relevant or enlightening, but nice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
135. Abortion is not murder, and an embryo is not a child. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #135 |
147. But if she did have an abortion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:33 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #149 |
152. That's a good point. But the truth is an absolute defense. If I said you killed your skin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #149 |
211. When I had chemotherapy, it killed the cancer cells in my body. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #211 |
213. When my friend had his kidney removed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #213 |
214. That's not the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #213 |
217. The kidney did die. The doctor didn't exclaim it because that wasn't the purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenichol
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
220. Actually he said, "...she killed MY child..." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. Because he defamed her character in written (i.e. printed) words in a public manner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
askeptic
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. The truth is not libelous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #53 |
85. What "truth?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. Just publishing negative information about someone is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #55 |
86. Nope, it is a printed defamation of character. Look up the definition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #86 |
113. Right after you do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #113 |
128. So you're saying you do not know the definition of "defamation of character?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #128 |
203. You are the one who seem to have no clue as to what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:42 AM Response to Reply #86 |
123. Simple yes or no question. Is the truth a defense to libel? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:09 AM Response to Reply #123 |
129. Oh, yes! I can play this game: Is this not a defamation of character in writing, also known as libel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #129 |
151. I will answer your question once you answer mine. Is truth an absolute defense to libel? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:04 AM Response to Reply #86 |
140. i love all the folks here coming to do one thing: comment only to defend the guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #140 |
177. No one is defending the asshole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. Did you read the absolute defences to libel when reading that definition? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
87. Because he did not use the term "abortion" he accused her of killing someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Killing someone is not always illegal. Capital punishment, military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:23 AM Response to Reply #92 |
131. Technically an abortion is just the termination of a pregnancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopTheNeoCons
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. Yes Yes Yes +1 million...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
54. If what he put on the billboard is not false info, then it's not libel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurska
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
68. Unless she didn't have an abortion it isn't libel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebecca_herman
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:12 AM Response to Reply #68 |
130. he's actually admitted he's not sure whether she had an abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
142. Her name, picture or likeness isn't on the billboard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. And now anyone with a lick of sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. +2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surrealAmerican
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
48. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #21 |
144. "Would you have this asshole's baby?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
148. Or perhaps just a statistic of how much domestic abuse begins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Ha! ... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
45. indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
69. And that should be her billboard in response to his. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
138. I hope no one else will either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. They really ARE subhuman monsters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinymontgomery
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. Doesn't HIPPA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I *think* it applies to providers, not John Q Public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinymontgomery
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Yea, I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
59. Your friend is not obligated to keep your medical issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinymontgomery
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #59 |
212. Your friend is not obligated BY HIPPA to do so, but there's a more general right of privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
75. HIPPA applies broadly, but not to everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Does HIPPA apply to employer/provider only? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. it's HIPAA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
58. HIPAA applies to medical providers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. I would think defamation of character and slander would also apply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Indeed, the civil case is quite clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madaboutharry
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
17. This man is at the very least emotionally abusive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. What an asshole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Put up a billboard saying he abused her. And yes, odds are that he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. Instead of courts ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
24. Here's the photo: truly shabby and stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevStPatrick
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. I don't see the invasion of her privacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. It doesn't seem worth pondering to you that anyone who knew her, even superficially, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #34 |
112. Actually, quite a few depending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trud
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
39. very weird looking individual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. He's a real winner. Hard to believe she went anywhere with him in the first place. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChrisBorg
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
66. Wouldn't he have to identify the woman for slander or libel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebecca_herman
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
71. hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky Luciano
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
103. One ugly dude! Wow! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plumbob
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:57 AM Response to Reply #24 |
125. I also encourage anyone to stop doing business with the greedy assholes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
25. ooh, the douche has a facebook account! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. http://www.facebook.com/gfultz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #30 |
79. The facebook page is kinda strange... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. The media company should not have allowed him to rent that billboard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #26 |
42. Well, technically it should be up to the courts to decide what is or isn't libel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
70. Could you expand on why you think she has a clear libel case? Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #70 |
88. You keep repeating that argument, copy and paste ad infinitum a point makes not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #88 |
96. and you keep failing to recognise that truth is an absolute defense to libel. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebecca_herman
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. he admits he doesn't even know if she had an abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:05 AM Response to Reply #101 |
120. The OP link says "her friends" say it was a miscarage. His attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:27 AM Response to Reply #120 |
132. If he has to subpoena her medical records, then he could be in even worse shape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #70 |
141. the thing that troubles you the most about this story is that she might sue the guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #141 |
166. How very strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #166 |
169. they posted again and again on the same issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #169 |
171. No, it's actually fantastic to assume, as you have, that the poster cares at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #171 |
185. You found the male who did this a sympathetic character --that's that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #185 |
188. Absolute bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #188 |
189. Then what was it you were not ready to believe about the man who did this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #189 |
195. Huh? Where do you get this stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 08:47 AM Response to Reply #42 |
139. He didn't name her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #139 |
183. He did name her. His "organization" NANI - her name is Nani. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #183 |
184. That's a very common asshole pattern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
111. More likely, business before ideology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
29. Wow this guy seems very controlling. Good for her because its her body. For me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
33. We had a name for guys who acted like this in college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
35. The way this fucker is acting, she did the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. Or maybe he's just very upset. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Correction: He should be with someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. On the first point, I agree. On the second, I didn't realize he had raped her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
81. Deleted message |
gejohnston
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #81 |
114. Not what she said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:48 AM Response to Reply #114 |
117. Deleted message |
musette_sf
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:31 PM Response to Reply #114 |
154. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #114 |
158. Yes, it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #158 |
167. It was explained to you last night. More than once, as I recall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #167 |
174. And not very well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #174 |
179. He's not a rapist, as far as we know. And you're the only one who thinks anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #179 |
190. Then do explain why she even mentioned it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #190 |
194. Who insinuated anything about you, and what was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #194 |
196. It was something to the effect of me 'hating women', and it was more than insinuated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #196 |
199. You have a vivid imagination. The only people in that sub-thread were you, me, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #199 |
200. I hate to break this to you, but that subthread wasn't the only exchange I've had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #200 |
202. Again, why do you feel that you are a victim or a target here? Why are you so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:51 PM Response to Reply #202 |
204. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #204 |
206. "No better than a rapist" =/= 'a rapist' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #206 |
207. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #194 |
198. Oh, and I'm still waiting for that explanation that was apparently perfect and rational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #198 |
215. i don't think THAT was the post that got the subthread deleted LOL n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #56 |
83. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:24 AM Response to Reply #56 |
121. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:41 AM Response to Reply #56 |
122. Deleted message |
Hosnon
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #56 |
218. We need a new internet "law" similar to Godwin's Law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #49 |
94. When you have a child with someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #94 |
105. Deleted message |
plumbob
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:59 AM Response to Reply #49 |
126. He needs to be prevented from reproducing - don't need these genes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
36. Definitely a dick move... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savalez
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
64. I guess the question is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. I think the word "kill" is the key... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
38. This is why contraception exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. Maybe he should have married her & not made a bastard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
107. or wrapped it up beforehand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #107 |
219. true too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
44. I would imagine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I love that nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
60. I like it too. Free speech is free speech, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iemitsu
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #60 |
89. his actions don't necessarily mean he wanted children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #89 |
95. Deleted message |
iemitsu
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #95 |
102. i am a male and certainly don't believe they are all assholes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Deleted message |
iemitsu
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. clearly i don't know the true motivation of the sign poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:50 AM Response to Reply #108 |
119. Deleted message |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #108 |
161. We simply don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iemitsu
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #161 |
210. his paying for and posting the sign reveals much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #95 |
145. I have to judge your story by the way you defend the guy in this story's actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #145 |
157. I do not 'defend' anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #89 |
160. This maybe true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #160 |
164. oh, poor innocent victim.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #164 |
168. Wow. I'm going to do something for you that you seem incapable of; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:49 AM Response to Reply #44 |
118. Your first caption is a good one, but I'm pretty sure he's already sent that message more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
52. Perhaps.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
76. Deleted message |
glinda
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
65. Harassment and violation of one's privacy is not free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
73. I have an interesting question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
74. He's going to win every case filed against him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebecca_herman
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. allegedly it does name her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. The town only has about 30,000 people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #80 |
97. Here is the Billboard: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Nani is the girlfriend's name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #100 |
115. If that is his idea of humour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #115 |
116. In another thread, I noted that she should get a protective order and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #116 |
182. No problem. I am American who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #74 |
134. He names her in the billboard (nani) and she already had a previous restraining order against him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 09:22 AM Response to Reply #134 |
143. Comments from a law prof over coffee this AM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
77. Anyone who would make a 'billboard' like that is a piece of shit. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #78 |
153. convinced now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #153 |
156. Right, he's a piece of shit. That much is clear. I still disagree with the above statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #156 |
159. What valid, plausible scenarios would validate his actions as moral? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #159 |
162. There are any number of reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #162 |
165. really, really stretching it here LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #165 |
170. Hey, you asked. And it's hardly a stretch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #162 |
173. ''That would be a highly moral position.'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #173 |
175. I'm not a fan of 'morality'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #175 |
178. What you call ''hysterics'' is the natural reaction to seeing someone try to defend the indefensible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #178 |
186. Just what is it that you think I'm defending? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #186 |
187. It is painfully obvious and therefore in no need to be pointed out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #187 |
192. Deleted message |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #187 |
205. Yes, of course, it's so immensely obvious that you can't point to any of the blatant obviousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #162 |
191. I'm afraid I do not see how your circumstances justify his actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #191 |
193. Where did I ever say his actions were justified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #78 |
172. "Not that I disagree" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #172 |
197. So, I agree with the guy and I ask what his reasoning is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
91. **FULTZ Posting Domestic Abuse "Jokes" on Twitter** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:35 PM Response to Reply #91 |
209. I hope the far right latches on to this guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
93. Holy crap, check out his twitter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supply Side Jesus
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #93 |
104. ya, this dude needs some help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:34 AM Response to Reply #93 |
133. Astounding, the guy is literally making death threads against his ex-gf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #133 |
176. Freudian Post O' The Month! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GETPLANING
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
98. That was cruel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
99. I take issue with the headline..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
110. Greg FOOLtz might've stolen the photo too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plumbob
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
124. I'd be happy to contribute to a billboard explaining how moronic, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
136. So he's taking the breakup pretty hard, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAnthony
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
137. Kind of amazing that any woman would have found him worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indypaul
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
150. Has he established that it was indeed "his" child? N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
155. If he didn't name her or depict her in another way, can she say he libeled 'her' specifically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 04:52 PM Response to Reply #155 |
180. Oh, but he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #180 |
181. Ahh, he tries to be clever with the acronym. I see that. Wonder if that matters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenrr
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
163. what a putz! (the boyfriend) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
201. Ex-girl friend, not even his wife... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Tue Jun-07-11 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
208. Reading Yahoo comments on this story confirms for me...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
216. At least the girlfriend knows beyond a doubt that she made the right decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenichol
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #216 |
221. Yours is the best perspective I've seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Wed Jun-08-11 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
222. abortion is an issue where if the two parties disagree, there's no way to compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC