|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
wtmusic
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:22 PM Original message |
Radiation 1,000 times normal at Japan nuke plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. OMG! This IS NOT good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yep. It's "Show Time" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaDUer
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. another article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. You would think, given that Japan was the first "victim" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. But extremely wealthy men need to get richer no matter what the cost--to others. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Given that japan has no oil reserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Japan uses nuclear power for two simple reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Japan has sunshine -- we all do -- and it's time to move to green/alternative energy -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickerwoman
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Agree with 99.9% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Just said almost exactly this in a post I made -- !! Ironic, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
190. They have no oil, or coal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. You still get more of a dose every time you fly in an airplane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ptah
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Good info! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. If there is no water to cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ptah
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I under stand we are nowhere near the end of this event. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. there are 4 plants down....2 that will def have melt downs and 2 others that prob will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Two CERTAIN meltdowns based on a twitter post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. no...based on this Christian Science Monitor article & Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You said 'def'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. (Now) 3 nuclear reactors in trouble after Japan quake (Real Meltdown Risk)...link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I think it's safe to assume all three reactors that were online at Fukushima Daiichi are'in trouble' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. And YOU personally are guaranteeing what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #34 |
166. Currently reactor 1 is in danger, two is sort of not being talked about, and three is safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 09:47 AM Response to Reply #166 |
267. Storage tanks/waste are an additional threat - no nuclear plant is "safe" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I don't think "meltdown" means what you think it means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
277. And they could get to a real meltdown ... nuclear reactors aren't safe ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. (Now) 5 cited and U.S.-based Nuke Energy Inst. says even if a meltdown occurs, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #28 |
189. This type of reactor can't really do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:48 AM Response to Reply #28 |
223. They now have detected cesium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #223 |
279. Can you relate anything more on "cesium" .... did find this link .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 06:07 AM Response to Reply #28 |
261. IT HAS HAPPENED !!! EXPLOSION !!! EVACUATING 12 MILE RADIUS and stopping cars 60 miles away turning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
278. +1000% -- one of the things we can be sure of is the downplaying ... !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. But you only get that for the few hours an avg person flies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. That is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Let's hope it is minimized as soon as possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. oh, geesh, don't throw logic into a pro-nuker's argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. oh, yeah, we know, nukes are safe & Chernobyl, 3 Mi. Isl. & Fukushima never happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Btw, pilots are showing effects of that -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. This stuff will not only hit "Downwinders" -- i.e., all of us -- will return with rain ...!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bosonic
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. source: twitter.com/BreakingNews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. get ready for 2 major melt downs....they cannot fix this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Army is delivering batteries for the backup systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Where are you tracking this info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Mar-11-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. kr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
37. Venting air from reactor container suspended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Hey, did you know that bananas are naturally radioactive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #42 |
263. Are you calling me toxic? :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. uh-oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Frick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Actually... yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Japanese Government quoted on Al Jazeera "A meltdown is probable." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. AP is saying possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. latest blog post seems to indicate a meltdown is in progress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. oohh boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phlem
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
45. To depressing to reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. There is one up the road right on the fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 03:11 AM Response to Reply #47 |
251. It is hard to imagine a worse place for a reactor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. I envision Spock in the Enterprise's reactor core.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Oh trust me, I am not making light of what they are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. And 'some folks' round these parts are imagining personal insults. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:33 AM Response to Reply #50 |
245. Please don't, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:37 AM Response to Reply #245 |
246. Not you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Chernobyl was built to withstand pretty much nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
273. That is false. Chernobyl had a containment system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 03:02 AM Response to Reply #273 |
293. You forgot a word there. "Partial" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
53. March 12, 2011, Japan warns of meltdown at quake-hit plant: Kyodo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Purveyor
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
54. Official: 2 Japanese Plants Struggling To Cool Radioactive Material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. and the nuke lovers cant stroke each other fast or hard enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. nothing to see here .... move along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Deleted message |
Gman
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Very precariously and very temporarily they are under control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #61 |
68. It's called an 'overabundance of caution'. It's the mature, responsible thing to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #68 |
268. And an "Oh shit, WTF is gonna happen next?" type of fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #68 |
282. Adults who make mistakes -- often! And lie about it -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Dog help them all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
59. The next few hours will be critical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. 1000x normal levels is 1/3 the exposure you get from the sun every year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. control room personel are already dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Are they now? According to whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #63 |
76. news agencys, your attitutude towards this horror is disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Please link news agency claiming the people in the control room are dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:57 AM Response to Reply #80 |
249. its melting now? gj with the nuke lobby lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. No, not now, cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Oh please. OOOOH 1 THOUUUUSSAND TIMES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Okie dokie I will try hard to forget all that scary theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. We shall see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I am not running to the hills either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Fair enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Of course I have five to seven days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine_Nurse
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Stop being so rational, its a buzzkill for all the panic junkies here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. I do have one rational concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Nuclear, Chemical Troops have been moved to the area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine_Nurse
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #78 |
81. and some will go in to help anyway. There are people that run from screams and others... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Having been there done that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. We are NOWHERE near that scenario right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. right now it is... but you still will have to issue people rad badges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Sure, recent reuters update pasted below indicates reactor meltdown likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Ok welp, I love your attitude, I really do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. What personal insult? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Look down for the update |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Radiation is too scary for people. Mercury poisoning over time, we're fine with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. I am NOT fine with either, but that is just me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
77. wouldn't "1000x normal levels" mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. 'normal levels' is the nominal output from this reactor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #79 |
99. Well, it's not very clear, when they say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #99 |
100. 'normal' radiation we receive from all source is between 450-650 mrem/year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Yes, I agree, the reporter has not made it clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
83. Psst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. HOLY SHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Unverified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
92. Not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
93. More |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #93 |
95. AP now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #95 |
96. AFP again: No meltdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
94. Breaking: Reuters pressure in Reactor three falling back to normal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #54 |
97. Definitely NOT GOOD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. Yo someone tell him to unblock me so he can see I didn't insult him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
102. Radiation leak confirmed at quake-hit Fukushima plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Is that Fuk u or Fuk us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. You just answered my question. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Oh, say it isn't so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
107. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
108. Is it not ironic -- in the selling ice to the Eskimos sense -- that Japan..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eljo_Don
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #108 |
111. reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Exactly -- in a post by someone else the "storage pools" in Japan may cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Forbes article /cooling ponds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #116 |
266. If Obama continues to push to subsidize new nuclear plants here, I want a RECALL -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #266 |
272. I'm already at that point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:43 PM Response to Reply #272 |
275. Well, a little different for me -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
certainot
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
109. no problem, the release of steam may require that our cells mutate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
christx30
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #109 |
115. I'm hoping that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
certainot
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #115 |
117. toad power! with poisonous pustules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
110. Maybe not "immediate" threat..but long term threat likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Yeah, what does not an immediate threat mean exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
112. Link to Hanford Nuclear Reservation release data - WA state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #102 |
118. Japan has 53 nuclear power plants and sits on a very active part of the "Ring of Fire" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
119. Snap analysis: Japan may have hours to prevent nuclear meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. I am trying to pretend this has nothing to do with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northoftheborder
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Really scary. It could happen in Cal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
122. Oh boy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
123. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
124. Good luck to them and ARGH for the use of "may" in a news article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
125. Not good at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
126. True... 3 Mile Island type partial core meltdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paradoxical
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. No chance of Chernobyl because Chernobyl had no containment dome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #127 |
133. Forbes article quote disagrees (link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #127 |
135. I hope you"re right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #127 |
297. In retrospect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. Won't be like TMI either. PWR versus BWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adsos Letter
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #128 |
130. And the lack of electrical power they provided, I suppose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. That too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
129. One, two, or all six reactors at this site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #129 |
132. 1-3 are all at risk for the same reasons. 4-6 were offline at the time of the quake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #129 |
134. ...mostly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
136. Japanese government demands Tepco open valve at Fukushima #1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jannyk
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #136 |
137. Their government is full of Nuclear Experts? Wow, we had a President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #137 |
138. "their" country is full of nuke power plants, why would this be a surprise? Maybe unlike OUR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #138 |
140. No matter who oversees and runs them there is human error and there is Global Warming ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #140 |
145. Um... Global Warming? What the hell does that have to do with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #145 |
150. Global Warming is increasing earthquakes -- in number and severity .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #150 |
153. Is it now? Based on what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #153 |
155. Global Warming will increase earthquake activity and intensity -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #155 |
156. Not a record at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #156 |
157. Anything above 8 is described as a GREAT earthquake ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #157 |
158. There is no recent uptick in frequency or strength of earthquakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #158 |
161. Disagree -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #158 |
163. Japan suffered repeated earthquakes today -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #163 |
165. That is normal in conjunction with a large quake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 09:44 AM Response to Reply #165 |
265. They are new earthquakes ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #265 |
269. There are always new earthquakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #269 |
276. 140 new aftershocks after the massive earthquake in Japan -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #276 |
287. That's perfectly normal for this kind of seismic event. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #269 |
283. Japan is repeatedly suffering new earthquakes in aftershocks which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:30 AM Response to Reply #283 |
288. And there can, and possibly will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #288 |
289. It certainly isn't NORMAL-- it is anything but NORMAL -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 01:36 AM Response to Reply #289 |
290. Don't take my word for it. Ask any geologist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 02:28 AM Response to Reply #290 |
291. "Fantasy"? Whose? Earthquake has been upgraded to a 9 and two reactors now in meltdown...!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 02:34 AM Response to Reply #291 |
292. I will repeat again. There is nothing unusual about the earthquake itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 03:33 PM Response to Reply #291 |
295. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #138 |
144. Oversee? Oversee? But . . . but wouldn't that make the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eljo_Don
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #144 |
154. Nuclear reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #154 |
264. Actually no, I've never seen an episode of The Simpsons, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #137 |
139. We've had more than one President who couldn't pronounce the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #136 |
141. Thank you for all of the info -- frightening -- and we can see we're all "Downwinders" .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #136 |
142. Kinda like BP had lots of experts - except they didn't - and the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #142 |
146. Agree about BP - but disagree about government "experts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #146 |
149. Not 'incompetent' - 'complicit' . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #149 |
151. +1000% -- Oil is now a "national security issue" -- MIC uses 80% of our oil -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #149 |
162. yep n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:30 AM Response to Reply #136 |
143. Update 7:51: 20,000 people evacuated an expert who thinks there is only a few hours until meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #143 |
147. One, two, or all six reactors at this site? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #147 |
159. Three are technically at risk. Three were offline, and two are under construction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #143 |
148. That's not the scary part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #148 |
152. Insane -- meanwhile should we all survive this -- if Obama persists in subsidizing more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #152 |
160. We will survive this fine, and nuclear power will continue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:18 AM Response to Reply #160 |
285. Nonsense ... survival isn't only about living -- but how you live ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #143 |
164. Not a "meltdown". The reactors are fully shut down. They're just still hotter than Hades... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
167. NUKE PLANT: METLDOWN FEARS, 20,000 Evacuated, Government Holds Emergency Meeting, Radiation Levels 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FedUpWithIt All
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
168. KyodoNews: BREAKING NEWS: Radioactive Cesium detected near Fukushima plant: nuke safety commission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FedUpWithIt All
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #168 |
171. Meltdown would possibly affect a 6 km range |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #171 |
177. From what I recall the affected radius from Three Mile was much greater than 6 miles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #177 |
187. Perhaps, as this plant is on the ocean, the prevailing winds would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:18 AM Response to Reply #187 |
230. How odd. I just read someone who had the same recollection as me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
169. Oh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
170. I note the absence herein of comments from our resident rabid pro-nuke DUer....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #170 |
172. We have a couple and he will will be here soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #170 |
173. probably will be by soon to tell us it is not even as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #170 |
180. Doesn't dare show his face!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
174. Subject was cut off - says: "Radiation levels 1000x normal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
175. This is a great live blog site from Reuters - Up to date live blogs on Japan Nuke Issues: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
176. I'm having a snack of frozen blueberries. Antioxidants tonight; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #176 |
182. I had some fresh blueberries earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #167 |
178. now it says that they may be having a meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #167 |
179. now it says that they may be having a meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #179 |
181. I just want to point out that your 666th post was about a meltdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #167 |
183. Where's the link to the camera on the reactor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #167 |
184. From AJ Live Blog: 45,000 people told to evacuate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #184 |
186. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #167 |
185. MSNBC says it's official... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #167 |
188. 45,000 people living within a 10km radius of the Fukushima nuclear power plant told to evacuate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
191. Nuclear emergency declared at quake-damaged reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #191 |
192. Damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #192 |
193. Possible meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #193 |
195. Don't worry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #193 |
196. Still has containment housing, unlike chernobyl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #196 |
198. You understand what 'venting' means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #198 |
199. Ding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #199 |
201. If you live on the West coast you may find out soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #201 |
203. Santa Cruz. We just had 3 M worth of damage in the harbor from the tsunami. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #203 |
205. It is a might... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #205 |
208. The inability to dispose "safely" of the byproduct, and the catastrophic implications associated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:58 PM Response to Reply #208 |
280. True -- and it seems only INTERNET is pointing to storage pool dangers ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:41 AM Response to Reply #201 |
220. It depends on whether it breaks the containment or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:18 AM Response to Reply #220 |
229. Pools are risk are not containable they are outside.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:20 AM Response to Reply #229 |
231. I know, hell of a way to boil water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:40 AM Response to Reply #229 |
247. Little easier to flood/circulate those with portable water and power sources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:39 AM Response to Reply #247 |
260. Also easy for them to be breached and wash out to sea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #260 |
284. Exactly ... and would we know this if it had happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #220 |
281. Supposedly still contained from what I heard earlier this evening on TV ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #198 |
207. Which can be stopped with the turn of a valve. They are venting it on purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #196 |
200. Please read this....Cooling ponds NOT covered. R at risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #192 |
197. First the bombs and now this... Ugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #191 |
194. So sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #191 |
202. Move along...nothing happening here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #191 |
204. From AJ Live Blog: 45,000 people told to evacuate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #191 |
206. What a horrible dilemma. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:17 AM Response to Reply #206 |
228. Skunk in the house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CHIMO
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
209. Japan issues state of emergency at 2nd nuclear plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northoftheborder
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:38 AM Response to Reply #209 |
210. OK. I'm now officially in panic mode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
211. but nuclear is so much cleaner than..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
212. direct link to the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
213. Earlier today on HuffPo an article said there were problems at THREE plants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #213 |
217. One turbine caught fire at Onagawa reactor site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
214. Update - FIVE 'units' now under 'state of emergency' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #214 |
215. Holy shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #215 |
218. Clam down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:49 AM Response to Reply #218 |
224. I'm eating mushrooms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CHIMO
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
216. Japan declares emergencies at 2 nuclear plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #209 |
219. isn't nuclear energy awesome?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #219 |
222. Think I'll go bask in it in about 3 days... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
221. Ok kids, we have a meltdown, they just need to make it official |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
225. Updates from the Twitter feed of Rachel Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
226. AJE updtate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
227. Local Prof sounding like a few people here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arrowhead2k1
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:23 AM Response to Reply #227 |
232. The Japanese have been trying to down play this situation from the first hour but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:28 AM Response to Reply #232 |
233. As a former emergency worker I am conflicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
234. Update AJE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
235. Japan declares nuclear emergency at quake-hit reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #235 |
236. Safe and sound, huh atheist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #236 |
237. huh? were you asking me a question or just making a general statement? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #237 |
239. He or she is referring to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jus_the_facts
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #235 |
238. A fallout map.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #238 |
240. Hahahaha 3000 rads based upon what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #238 |
241. Ah ONLY 750 RADS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #241 |
242. If a 750 rad line hits the west coast like that, we'll be living in south america. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:33 AM Response to Reply #238 |
244. source? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #244 |
248. It's definitely a hoax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 07:28 AM Response to Reply #238 |
262. You forgot the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 02:33 AM Response to Reply #235 |
243. A reminder from Uncle Tupelo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
250. CONFIRMED Explosion heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 03:12 AM Response to Reply #250 |
252. AJE feed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:16 AM Response to Original message |
253. Japan Nuclear Reactor Faces Meltdown Threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
therebis1930
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:16 AM Response to Reply #253 |
254. First it was 3km |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:37 AM Response to Original message |
255. Agency: Uranium fuel may be melting at reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:37 AM Response to Reply #255 |
256. Not Credible: These were containers of US depleted uranium ammunition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mysterysoup
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:37 AM Response to Reply #256 |
257. That isn't funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadEyeDyck
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:37 AM Response to Reply #255 |
258. How many times can you say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 05:37 AM Response to Reply #255 |
259. Can you receive the BBC news link outsdie of the UK ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 10:56 AM Response to Reply #259 |
270. It says "The content doesn't seem to be working". Could be overloaded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #270 |
271. I think maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FedUpWithIt All
![]() |
Sat Mar-12-11 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
274. Kicking this thread for today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
286. "A partial meltdown was likely under way at second nuclear reactor: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
294. Just to add that there were "warnings" due to increasing seismic activity -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #294 |
296. Thanks for the cross-posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC