|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 09:42 PM Original message |
Dodd, Leahy, Feingold, and Merkley Announce Bill to Repeal Retroactive Immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good news! K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Very nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. This would mean almost as much to me as REAL healthcare reform... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
38. Really? Did you vote for Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Thanks for flashing your PUMA credentials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:13 AM Response to Reply #46 |
61. and the poster got the terminology wrong ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:29 AM Response to Reply #61 |
78. Maybe they mean "Lifetime Channel Democrat"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #46 |
80. Oh please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:29 AM Response to Reply #80 |
87. You save the PUMA baloney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Good -- I would hate to be mistaken.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Says the guy who voted against the Democratic candidate for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #92 |
98. A few corrections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. A.) Unspecified in your profile, I took a 50/50 shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #103 |
111. Funny? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #111 |
117. No way HRC would have done any of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #117 |
124. Well I know Obama wasn't in the senate long.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. your Clinton lore is adorable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:24 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. Fresh pizza. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. Yeah, because dissent is not welcomed on this board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:00 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. No because it was a sockpuppet as it disclosed on another thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
130. Good for you!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. The Democratic Agenda ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. LOL - she voted against immuniy. He voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #104 |
118. her threat to obliterate Iran placed her right up there with the neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #118 |
123. And Obama threatening to obliterate pakistan.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. What's different? He's president and she's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:31 AM Response to Reply #38 |
51. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:53 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Doesn't matter if Obama "gets behind" it or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:14 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Ah, but he will stand in the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:27 AM Response to Reply #62 |
70. Sounds about right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
105. Nailed It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #62 |
119. hey since you're making predictions, got any winning lottery numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #56 |
100. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
72. Your vote for HRC was hardly a stand on "Democratic principles". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
75. Former and no longer life-long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #75 |
102. I see.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #102 |
116. you voted against the democratic nominee in the general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #38 |
88. HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlingBlade
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kick and Hope ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm doin' my happy dance! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's fucking ABOUT TIME!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. AT&T won't bargain in good faith with CWA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. Maybe they're using this repeal threat as a bargaining chip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
76. Or, this is just another cash infusion from the telecoms. Old trick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. I'm still glad I transferred my long distance service to Qwest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Do you think it still is the policy of Qwest? I'm in doubt about it now and I can't make a case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
129. he was sentenced to 6 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Wait . . . I thought Bush put them out of business . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadGimp
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. Stop teasing me dammit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wow..what a concept.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. I sure am glad we elected Merkley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Me, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:32 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. As far as I can tell, he is putting Wyden to shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. oh yes! Can I sue them for the damage caused? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
29. One pays the price and pays it forward to future generations who may care enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
99. I want all my fees refunded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. Great news . . . but then . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Mon Sep-28-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. The head of Qwest was a crook, unfortunately.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:27 AM Response to Reply #19 |
77. Nacchio and Qwest: Another Political Prosecution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. I have NO doubt it was political.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #82 |
108. "appeared to be dirty," is the key phrase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. They'll hold tight to these cases, like Siegelmann's, I'm sure, because . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
20. WHO turned on the Progressive Floodgates? 1st the Canadian generic prescription bill, and now this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seedersandleechers
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I'm not getting my hopes up that either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:08 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Congress has decided to do some work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:41 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. My thoughts are the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
21. That would be a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
22. bring it on! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
25. The rule of law applies to all and not just when it's convenient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
27. Great! About damn time! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
28. I Rec for FUCKING SANITY AND THE RULE OF LAW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
30. Yahooooooooo! Call call call! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
31. rec. but it will never pass or amount to anything. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
32. Excellent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:14 AM Response to Original message |
34. Hip! Hip! Horray! This means so much to me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
35. So, retroactively, the Rule Of Law, Habeas Corpus. Bill of Rights, etc. etc. shall be restored? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RJDem
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:06 AM Response to Original message |
37. They must have forgotten Obama voted for immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
39. It would be great to get back to being a nation of laws. Down with Dictators! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
40. now they just need to act on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
41. Oh, Senator Dodd... every time I think I'm "out" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:02 AM Response to Original message |
42. We need to introduce the same bill in the House of Representatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
43. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:06 AM Response to Original message |
44. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
45. now THIS is an interesting constitutional question! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazyjoe
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
47. can you say "Dodd is down in the polls"........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
48. But, but . . . that would mean corporations might have to obey the law! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
49. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
50. Rec - Will be interesting to see how the 'Pubs demonize this - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:40 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Nope, those poor multi-billion $ telecoms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Wed Sep-30-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #53 |
141. Wait - you mean Bush LIED to them???!!!!???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
52. yeah r-i-g-h-t...! and whatever became of the Karl Rove/Harriet Miers testimony - spin-spin it'll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
54. How will this ever get through? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:33 AM Response to Reply #54 |
79. Wrong question. How much will this increase donations to both sides? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
55. Now, THAT'S change I can believe in!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
57. This would, if repealed, signal the country is following the rul of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reader Rabbit
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
58. Merkley's my senator! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #58 |
97. Me too! Merkley is kicking ass! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
59. Who Issued the Bass Knuckles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
60. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
63. Hurrah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
64. I'm going to wear my Jeff Merkley tee shirt today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
65. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
66. So, there's hope for justice after all? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
67. It'll be meaningless without prosecutions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:37 AM Response to Reply #67 |
81. Really, where is DoJ anyway? Bush violated the law, and he doesn't have immunity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
68. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
69. I never understood how you could apply the "retroactive" aspect. It seems that any crime could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
71. Can you say "Long Shot"?? But this is a HUGE step in the right direction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
73. yes!!! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
74. REC #166 - Go Bill Go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
83. Yeeeeeesssssssssssss! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
84. Wonderful news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StreetKnowledge
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
85. About motherf*!$%&@ing time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
86. I don't know the details, but I don't think this will fly Constitutionally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:48 AM Response to Reply #86 |
90. You don't know the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. One thing's for sure: I know more than you're capable of understanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Well thank you for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #94 |
114. Plan? I had a plan of how to respond to a simpleton who calls names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:45 PM Response to Reply #114 |
136. You ain't worth my spit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
89. About damn time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
95. Didn't Obama vote FOR the retroactive immunity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #95 |
113. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
96. Does it have any chance of passing? -nt- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
106. Exactly right, Dodd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dhpgetsit
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
107. Now aren't we glad we dumped Gordon Smith? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftcoastie
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
109. About time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
112. What is this really worth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
115. Then they can start investigating this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #115 |
122. 208 Recs before going to the dungeon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
120. k 'n r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
121. "This bill seeks to reverse the mistake of the last Congress" Obama said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #121 |
131. Maybe he voted for this sh*t because he did not want the mc$ame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2QT2BSTR8
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
125. Well it's about F@^#*&G time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
133. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
135. This should be amusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ms liberty
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
137. Well yay to that! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
138. THE DEMOCRATIC WING OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Tue Sep-29-09 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
139. YEAH!! !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Wed Sep-30-09 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
140. HOT DOG. This has gotten lot's of attention..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Sep-30-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
142. YAY!! good chance it won't pass and all but Hooray! for the effort. it is about time n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC