|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 04:30 PM Original message |
Will Coleman concede? "Hell no," says RNC head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sorest loserman ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. On this issue, my vote for loserman may have to go to Reid, who should have seated Franken long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'd like to get Franken in his seat, but . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueclown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. And hopefully the US SCOTUS promptly rejects their petition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. No way. The republicans control the US SC. They'll take the case and seat Coleman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 07:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Considering its a lot of the same folks, you have a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Supremes have long memories and are more protective of their legacy . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudoria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 08:51 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I agree... I don't think the SC, most of them anyway, want to hear this case at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. I sure hope you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. I would not count on Roberts for anything, unless I were a PNACer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Thats what aaaaaaaaaaahm talkinbout! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. WHAA WHAA WHAA! I want my Senate seat - MOMMY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Of course not -- that would take class, or at least the semblance of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. I hope Dems are taking notes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaneFordA (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I just wish... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Uh, check your history... it DID go to the SCOTUS and wham- he lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. That is right. The SC subverted the electoral process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harry_pothead (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. No we shouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 11:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Wouldn't Work for Us! It Only Works for Repiglickins Because They Own the Courts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. They own the courts AND the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 11:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. More importantly, whack them mercilessly for their crass . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. It is looking more and more like a 5-4 or 6-3 vote that will seat Coleman. No way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 08:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. How can they seat coleman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 09:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Easy. By stating that the votes were not properly counted and declaring him winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Same way they seated Bush when Gore had more votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. The Extreme Court can't seat the whiny douche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 07:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. The SC would rule in favor of Coleman, 5-4 or 6-3. No problem for R's in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. True, but that alone would not be enough to seat Fmr. Sen. Whiny Douche. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Hmmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Always good to see the Republicans in favor of votes being counted. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Strange that Normie didn't feel that way on November 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Exactly. Its the height of hypocrisy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Who will last longer -- Coleman or Steele? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Ok, SO...but he still LOST! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. Fine example of when 'tenacity runs amok' eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. This SHOULD wreck the Repub party in MN for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. How About Putting Cheney's Special Squad to Good Use, For Once? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. where is the pressure on Coleman to do the right thing? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
31. Coleman is done for as a MN candidate now though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Coleman does not care. He's been working for a think tank or something for months. This is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UP_4012 (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
40. Seems pretty clear to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 31st 2024, 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC