|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
cosmicone
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:34 PM Original message |
Arrested terrorist says gang hoped to get away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. fuck him and the rest of the assholes who went along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. The recruitment reminds me of Blackwater somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mithnanthy
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 06:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
51. I agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. If this is the case, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. What if Benazir Bhutto had not been killed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Sufis were great supporters of Bhutto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Her death had to be planned and I hate to say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. they set her up..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
61. Precisely. She wasn't squeaky clean, either, but BushCo did not want her. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hatalles
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. I don't see what would have been different... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. her husband is no Benazir and neither is her son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. She asked for more security and the the local police and military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. i'm talking about her sticking her head up there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Yes, I agree that that was a huge mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spindrifter
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. I ran across a report that there was a decapitated body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. interesting, i wonder if there were leaks, india was checking for "pirate" ships lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. "scary days" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spindrifter
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Their Coast Guard gave them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ex Lurker
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. it's a huge country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. Has it been proven yet who is really behind the massacre? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. No one appears to have claimed responsibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Well, I'm sure a reason will be provided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
43. I already know the reason. To get someone into war...or the next best thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 02:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
47. I thought it was a group called the Deccan Mujahadin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 05:28 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Anyone can, and does, claim credit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. My thoughts, as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. No kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. Qui Bono? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. who benefited from the attack on the twin towers? sometimes it's just about doing harm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Who benefited from the attacks on the twin towers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. "who benefited from the attack on the twin towers?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
35. If the reason behind the attack becomes a claim that al Queda did it and it is used to advance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. And an excuse to further the aims of the corporations. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
56. Well the Twin Towers, Bin Laden definitely benefitted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. I don't believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malidictus Maximus
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
21. Question about torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ex Lurker
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. I wouldn't be averse to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 06:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
52. As you say, it doesn't result in useful information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
63. There is no evidence of torture here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hatalles
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't see how a terrorist attack gains western sympathy for the Kashmir issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. You may have hit it there. Some people DO want war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ex Lurker
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Pakistan's new leader has been saying conciliatory things lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. One ambitious general, even a colonel, would be enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oak2004
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
57. The ISI is essentially a rogue agency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Wait... so because one person was *from* Pakistan, it proves that Pakistan sanctioned the attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Deleted message |
tclambert
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. But Pakistan has The Bomb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 04:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
48. That's the same rationale... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #48 |
64. Except in this case, Pakistan DOES envy India's rise and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Always? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
27. it's sure as hell not Al Qaeda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
55. Deleted message |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. No doubt there is no doubt. But I'd like actual evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Would you settle for Colin Powell presenting some cartoon drawings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. maybe a letter on yellow cake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happychatter
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
60. The news is saying they HAVE solid evidence of ISI logistical support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KakistocracyHater
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
39. hope they hook him up to lie detector |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
40. How can you say this? What justification do you have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. My thoughts too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 02:10 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Sounds like agitation for (the dark side of) *Hindutva* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
66. Except that "hindutwa" people are very few and are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. I think you're just a bitter, hateful person trying to stir up a holocaust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I think you have blinders on and are willing to forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II
![]() |
Sun Nov-30-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Thanks...you just proved my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Because of history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
42. "were made to believe by their Lashkar bosses that they were not being sent on a suicide mission" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
46. I disagree with the interpretation... There is most likely a definite British connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
49. I hate to ask the obvious question, but who runs "The Times of India"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. No, it's an independent Indian company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
54. only one way out and getting captured is not it. How soon til the two captured aquire "cult" status? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happychatter
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
59. That the ISI would support this w/full Paki Govt Sanction is simply incredible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
62. oh, do these guys deserve hot meals ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC