Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Boosts Its Use of Airstrikes In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:29 PM
Original message
U.S. Boosts Its Use of Airstrikes In Iraq
Source: Washington Post

The U.S. military conducted more than five times as many airstrikes in Iraq last year as it did in 2006, targeting al-Qaeda safe houses, insurgent bombmaking facilities and weapons stockpiles in an aggressive strategy aimed at supporting the U.S. troop increase by overwhelming enemies with air power.

Top commanders said that better intelligence-gathering allows them to identify and hit extremist strongholds with bombs and missiles, and they predicted that extensive airstrikes will continue this year as the United States seeks to flush insurgents out of havens in and around Baghdad and to the north in Diyala province.

The U.S.-led coalition dropped 1,447 bombs on Iraq last year, an average of nearly four a day, compared with 229 bombs, or about four each week, in 2006.

"The core reason why we see the increase in strikes is the offensive strategy taken by General Petraeus," said Air Force Col. Gary Crowder, commander of the 609th Combined Air Operations Center in Southwest Asia. Because the United States has sent more troops into areas rife with insurgent activity, he said, "we integrated more airstrikes into those operations."

more

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/16/AR2008011604148.html?wpisrc=newsletter



Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Article from June...

US Doubles Air Attacks in Iraq
By Charles J. Hanley
Associated Press
June 5, 2007
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issue...
Four years into the war that opened with "shock and awe," U.S. warplanes have again stepped up attacks in Iraq, dropping bombs at more than twice the rate of a year ago. The airpower escalation parallels a nearly four-month-old security crackdown that is bringing 30,000 additional U.S. troops into Baghdad and its surroundings - an urban campaign aimed at restoring order to an area riven with sectarian violence. It also reflects increased availability of planes from U.S. aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf. And it appears to be accompanied by a rise in Iraqi civilian casualties.
In the first 4 1/2 months of 2007, American aircraft dropped 237 bombs and missiles in support of
ground forces in Iraq, already surpassing the 229 expended in all of 2006, according to U.S. Air Force figures obtained by The Associated Press.
"Air operations over Iraq have ratcheted up significantly, in the number of sorties, the number of
hours (in the air)," said Col. Joe Guastella, Air Force operations chief for the region. "It has a lot to do with increased pressure on the enemy by MNC-I" - the Multinational Corps-Iraq - "combined with more carriers."
--------------------------------
Examples of attacks, as reported in the Air Force's daily summary:
-Last Friday, an Air Force F-16 fighter dropped a guided 500-pound bomb near the northern city of Tal Afar that destroyed a vehicle laden with explosives to be used as a bomb.
-The day before, an F-16 dropped a similar bomb on "an inaccessible building being used by insurgents" near Samarra, north of Baghdad, with "good effects."
-Last Wednesday, another F-16 dropped bombs on "an illegal bridge and an insurgent vehicle in Baghdad."

Police and other Iraqi sources sometimes report civilian casualties in such airstrikes that are not
reflected in the official U.S. accounts. Air Force Col. Gary Crowder, deputy director of the regional air operations center, said such casualties "pale in comparison" with civilian casualties from ground combat. "In Iraq, we minimize our deployment of air-delivered weapons in populated areas," he said. Crowder, Guastella and Cox were interviewed outside Iraq at the regional U.S. air headquarters.
--------------------------------------------------------
Air attacks in Iraq are still relatively low compared with the numbers of weapons dropped in
Afghanistan - 929 this year as of May 15.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/occupation/2007/0605bombardment.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Either airstrike casualties pale in comparison to those from ground combat...
or it's hard to see suffering from 20,000 feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Everyone should read the post-Tet chapters of Stanley Karnow's "Vietnam", specifically
with an eye to what happened during Nixon's so-called "Vietnamization" strategy.

To wit, as Nixon withdrew U.S. ground combat forces from Vietnam after January, 2969, the U.S. Air Force and its puppets in the South Vietnam Air Force drastically ramped up bombing raids in South Vietnam. Civilian casualties skyrocketed during these expanded air attacks.

Since there are so many obvious and not-so-obvious parallels between Vietnam and Iraq-nam, I wonder where the GI Resistance movement so common in Vietnam is in Iraq. I have heard anecdotal reports of troop mutinies and "search and avoid" missions in Iraq. But troop morale and unit cohesion still seems quite high compared to same in post-'69 Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yep, you oughta watch "Sir, No Sir" about this very thing - military couldn't
trust the GI's to actually go out on missions - they did airstrikes from Guam. Hellava dvd - netflix has it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I've got "Sir, No Sir" on my list. I am currently working with
members of Iraq Veterans Against the War in Los Angeles. They are doing important work in GI counseling right now. So yet another parallel to Vietnam, i.e., VVAW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. "better intelligence gathering" -- bullshit
More like: "If we rain enough destruction down we're likely to get an insurgent or two". :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deny and Shred Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good way to force new contracts - use existing ordinance
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 05:19 PM by Deny and Shred
Only a year left, keep those munitions factories a-hummin'.

Military Industrial Simplification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. 40,000 pounds of bombs and the surge is working. pfffft !
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 06:00 PM by L0oniX
I guess that will make the military industrial corporations happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. 1. Keep the troops on-base to reduce casualties.
2. Tell everybody the "surge" is working since the casualties are down.
3. Bomb the shit out of the place instead.

As long as the oil is secure, the Bush cabal doesn't care what happens to Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Home of the Brave my sweet Aunt Fanny
What's brave about dropping bombs from 20,000 feet up on unsuspecting people who can't fight back and can't get away? This is what America means to the rest of the world? Thanks a fucking heap, George W. Bush. Burn in hell, asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. along with the boost in collateral damage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. I Feel Sick - And Where Are The Pictures
I want proof that we are "flushing out" the bad men and not women and children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC