Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plan Would Ease F.C.C. Restriction on Media Owners: Would benefit Murdoch, Zell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:21 PM
Original message
Plan Would Ease F.C.C. Restriction on Media Owners: Would benefit Murdoch, Zell
Source: New York Times

By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: October 18, 2007

WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission has circulated an ambitious plan to relax the decades-old media ownership rules, including repealing a rule that forbids a company to own both a newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city.

Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the commission, wants to repeal the rule in the next two months — a plan that, if successful, would be a big victory for some executives of media conglomerates.

Among them are Samuel Zell, the Chicago investor who is seeking to complete a buyout of the Tribune Company, and Rupert Murdoch, who has lobbied against the rule for years so that he can continue controlling both The New York Post and a Fox television station in New York.

The proposal appears to have the support of a majority of the five commission members, agency officials said, although it is not clear that Mr. Martin would proceed with a sweeping deregulatory approach on a vote of 3 to 2 — something his predecessor tried without success. In interviews on Wednesday, the agency’s two Democratic members raised questions about Mr. Martin’s approach....

***

The deregulatory proposal is likely to put the agency once again at the center of a debate between the media companies, which view the restrictions as anachronistic, and civil rights, labor, religious and other groups that maintain the government has let media conglomerates grow too large....

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/business/media/18broadcast.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO. No. No. No.
Where is Teddy Roosevelt and his fucking big trustbusting stick when you need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I so agree.
Those in washington, both republican and democrat have let themselves be bought off these past few years to look the other way when it comes to mergers, though of course they dont call them bribes instead its a "campaign donation" or a "dinner".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Unfortunately, nowadays, you almost need money from these trusts to win the presidency
Once in the presidency, you can then appoint people to the FCC, people who believe in democracy over corporate profits. The problem is finding someone who isn't compromised on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. these guys make the turn of the century robber barons look like bungling pickpockets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. How can people like Martin look at their own faces in the mirror?
They have done so much deep damage to this country. It will take forever to fix the problems.

They already have been shown how strongly the people do NOT want these changes, people from all walks of life, people who are ordinarily political enemies agree on this subject.

Hoping and praying the Democrats will be able to reverse these hideous mistakes the FCC has made after Bush stole his office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. Martin doesn't look at his own face in the mirror.
He has a corporate-sponsored assistant to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has to be stopped - we're dead in the water if it goes thru. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE and media trustbusting NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deregulation run amuk
(I'm not sure I spelled amuk right, but you get the idea)

It wasn't so long ago that a company could own no more than one TV station, one AM station and one FM station in just 6 markets. The idea was that the airwaves were limited and a public trust, and should be shared by the most people willing to run a highly regulated business in which "equal time" was sacred and news was a must.

Some stations abused this privilege. I used to work for an FM rock station in Chicago that required me to run a 40 minute newscat at 5 in the morning. Outside of a few public service spots, it was just me reading wire copy, the newspaper, the backs of cereal boxes.... whatever. I bet you could count my listeners on both hands and still have fingers left over.

But at least the station was meeting its news requirement. Plus, it was a job that paid half way decent money.

Now, thanks to deregulation, moguls like Murdoch and Clear Channel can own hundreds of stations, including two, three or more in the same market. Local, creative programming is a thing of the past. News?? Fuggedabout.

And the FCC wants to loosen the rules even more? Morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The largest media company is Google which is a near monopoly in all markets - but I agree
that one TV station, one AM station and one FM station still make sense - esp. since a TV station that gets cable or TV & radio stations that gets ground and satellite and internet can still be regulated and still are news outlets that control most public opinion. Perhaps in a few yesrs if the internet has achieved the influence of the LA Times/Chicago Trib/NYT/Wash Post it will not matter - but internet based TV streaming licenses are not selling like hotcakes - or even available - just yet, and with todays infrastructure they'd clog the internet if they were available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. google has a monopoly? On what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. by market share they rule search and internet advertising (and yes there are other search
and ad companies, but market share defines "monopoly" - to say otherwise is sort of like pretending microsoft does not have a desktop monopoly because both linux/open office and Apple/works are in the market).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pissnoffrethugs Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh God!
I'm surprised the FCC hasn't granted Murdoch ownership of the FCC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. If this fascist shift in our nation continues
that scenario may be nearer than any of us realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. yes
It will be called The Rupert P. Murdoch Memorial FCC.



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. How true
The FCC is nothing but a bunch of spineless cowards. Moguls say "jump"; they answer "how high?"

By the way, welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Whan propaganda works, it works real damn well. You see the current insanity in this country, don't
you?

More controle over the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. let's see how fast it will take pelosi and riedto start pimping this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. If you are Concerned you can EMail Dem Commmissioner of FCC, Michael Copps, here:
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:_k-dG_8ekvgJ:www.fcc.gov/commissioners/copps/mail.html+Michael+Copps,+FCC&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&client=firefox-a

I know he is very concerned about this and hoping citizens will let him know how they feel. Last time the "internets" managed to stop more deregulation it was 200,000 letters and emails that stopped them. But, we were joined by the "Pro-Gun Lobby" which were part of all those e-mails. The "Gun Lobby" was worried that media deregulation would take away their guns for some reason...all of it I don't remember but I know the Liberal Internets helped stop the deregulation then...and we can do it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Are these people on crack?
Can you think of anything more damaging to democracy than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. I think one can obtain more value from crack than what this
Martin guy's is coming up with.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. WTF...
I can't stand it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder35 Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. someone needs to put a stop to all this takeovers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Oh hell no!

We are screwed if this passes.

Does this sound like a push for complete control and domination?

Hmm-what does this remind me of?

Both Fascism AND Communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. How much more "RELAXED" can it get??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Any Dem CongressCritter Voting For This Is Voting Themselves Out Of A Job
Guess which political party will benefit from more media consolidation?

Ans. It aint gonna be the one with a donkey as its mascot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. Not no, but fuck no....
...we need to reign in these out of control craporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. Okay guys...this is what we have to do.....
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 10:42 AM by Evoman
We find some women (and men)....real patriots....and we get as many of them as possible to show their tits on tv. With a media inundated with big, nipply tits, the fcc will be so busy looking out for our globular distractions, that they won't be able to completely ruin your media.

It can't fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. everytime one these bullshit rulings is posted we are all so shocked and dismayed...
folks, it's over.

The complete dismantling of America has begun. the congress if full of spineless lackeys, the moron* rules by decree, a supreme court with a thin glaze of integrity and as a nation we are filled with a bunch of mouth breathing hand wringers who stand by and hope that someone will have sense to stop it all.

always someone else's duty to do the hard stuff.

and so, here we are.

a nation of apathetic whiners screaming for others to do what we the people should be doing.

oh wait, who is the finalist on dancing with stars??

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
29. THE RULE WORKS... SO DOES EQUAL TIME FOR LIBERALS...
OR AS THE WEALTHY WOULD SAY... LETS BUY ALL THE MEDIA SO YOU GET ALL OUR FAIR AND BALANCED NEWS ALL THE TIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC