Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thompson defends gay marriage stance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:07 PM
Original message
Thompson defends gay marriage stance
Source: ap

Thompson defends gay marriage stance

By MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press Writer Mon Oct 1, 5:16 PM ET

NEWTON, Iowa - Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson said he's met frequently with influential social conservatives who are willing to accept his position on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage even though it doesn't go quite as far as they would like.
ADVERTISEMENT

Thompson favors a constitutional amendment that bars judges from legalizing gay marriage, but also leaves open the door for state legislatures to approve the practice. He said social and religious conservatives who would prefer an amendment that also bars legislatures from legalizing gay marriage can live with his view.

"Everyone I have talked to in my meetings like this, the answer has been yes," said Thompson. He conceded there are reservations.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071001/ap_on_el_pr/thompson_marriage;_ylt=ApySOjnSwsnsSDRIlixtmWWMwfIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oooh, are the fundies falling in love?
This should just about seal the deal on Fred's kablooey candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know when you're watching little kids interact and they don't know,
or don't care, that you're watching, and you find it hilarious how clumsily they mimic adult behaviours? Reading this article was kind of like that, except utterly devoid of the charm, cuteness and actual hilarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Courts interprate the law, they don't make it.
So conceivably, under Thompson's illogical amendment, the courts would be denied their constitutional responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like a violation of the balance of power principle n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. The same way Larry Craig defends his wide stance?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Filing that one away
The GOP isn't hypocritical about family values, they just have a "wide stance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's ask his first wife, as opposed to his current trophy bride,
how important marriage vows are to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
micraphone Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Plenty of gays in the movie industry
Where he's made plenty of bucks.

He obviously doesn't like - or try to understand - any of them.

Just another conservative hypocrit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Big Head Fred has to be careful, the Hollywood Gay Mafia could kill his career...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. so as I understand this . . . a state could pass legislation legalizing
gay marriage.

But in any court challenge, the judge would have to rule against gay marriage.

Do I have that right? Does this make any sense at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. The old "everybody's doing it" defense.
It rarely flies when children use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC