|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:23 PM Original message |
Former Presidents Can't Withhold Records |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Former Presidents don't have the right to seal records indefinitely, BUT......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. it appears a lot of the Bushreason for writing that order was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. SO TRUE! Iran-Contra was ONLY a very small part of the corruption started by THESE CRIMINALS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. so now it's time to file some freedom of information act requests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. protecting family interests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. The Supremos will secure the b*sh terrorists records |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I wouldn't have put it as succinctly or gingerly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Well, by the time it reaches the Supremes, he'll be gone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. They are public records. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. I can't believe we have to sue to read the papers of our ELECTED PRESIDENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Oh, about 6 1/2 years ago. You're only now noticing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imalittleteapot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's about time. Now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well, it's good news for the moment . . ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. Of course this'll be appealed and go to the U.S. S.Ct. You know what that means.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. there will be an unexplained library fire that will burn all of 41's papers and 43's too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 06:55 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. seriously ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. i'm not suprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Is that how they got rid of all bush* records on his AWOL (Reserve) stint? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oldtimeralso (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. 43's Library |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thor_MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. About frickin time!!! IMO, Executive Order 13233 should have been an impeachable offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. I am glad to hear this. They're gonna have to deal with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hopefully there are some reporters at the National Archives combing through... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. sounds like a job for....OLBERMANN'S STAFF!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. The White House did not immediately have a comment on the decision.--- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. "A bill that would overturn the order passed the House in March and is pending in the Senate."--but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I believe they will play the Nat'l Security card.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
22. I've been wondering about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
24. Who do they wish to nail on this one Bush II, Bush I or Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. There are Daddy Bush and Iran/Contra papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaStrega (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
29. Well the (current) Supremos will have plenty of time to consider ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 06:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Up next: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-01-07 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
30. But can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
31. Seven long years it took to get this ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
32. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
33. haven't they already been moved to the Bush library? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
36. gonna be some records - accidentally - go missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
37. Good. Must be about time to release some of Reagan and Poppy's records. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 31st 2024, 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC