Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Legitimate concerns' about arming Iraqi rebels: US commander(Petreaus deployment could be a decade)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 09:48 AM
Original message
'Legitimate concerns' about arming Iraqi rebels: US commander(Petreaus deployment could be a decade)
Edited on Sun Jun-17-07 10:15 AM by maddezmom
Source: AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Coalition commander General David Petraeus said Sunday there were "legitimate concerns" about a new US tactic in Iraq of arming Sunni insurgents against Al-Qaeda extremists.

But speaking on Fox News after criticism of the tactic from Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, Petraeus said it was still a viable way of pressing the fight in Iraq against Al-Qaeda.

Asked if the US-supplied weapons could later be turned on US forces or Shiite Muslims, the general said: "Well, those are legitimate concerns, and we have the same concerns."

But he said that US military commanders were trying to vet their new local allies "as best we can" through compiling biometric data and keeping track of weapons serial numbers.

~snip~

In comments published Saturday by Newsweek magazine, Maliki warned that the new US tactic was "dangerous because this will create new militias."

"I believe that the coalition forces do not know the backgrounds of the tribes. It is a job of the (Iraqi) government," he added.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070617/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqmilitarypetraeusmaliki_070617144246



Iraq deployment could last a decade: US
The US commander in Iraq says American troops could be needed in the country for a decade to battle insurgents.

General David Petraeus has told Fox News there is broad recognition that Iraq's daunting challenges will not be resolved "in a year or even two years".

"In fact, typically, I think historically, counter-insurgency operations have gone at least nine or 10 years," he said.

General Petraeus was responding to a question about whether US forces could face a Korea-style deployment in Iraq for decades.

He said any long-term deployment would depend on whether the Iraqi Government wanted to extend the US military presence.

"I'm not sure what the right analogy is, whether it's Korea or what have you," he said.

But he emphasised that a long-term security arrangement was "probably a fairly realistic assessment".

more:http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200706/s1953696.htm

U.S. should stop arming Sunni militias - PM Maliki

BAGHDAD, June 17 (Reuters) - The United States runs the risk of creating new militias in Iraq if it arms Sunni Arab tribesmen indiscriminately to battle al Qaeda, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said.

In an interview with Newsweek magazine, Maliki gave the first indication his government disagrees with the U.S. military policy of arming and equipping Sunni Arab tribes to fight al Qaeda militants under a model first used in Anbar province.

"We want to arm some tribes that want to side with us but on condition that we should be well aware of the tribe's background and sure that it is not connected with terror," Maliki said.

"Some (U.S.) field commanders make mistakes since they do not know the facts about people they deal with. I believe the Coalition forces do not know the background of the tribes," he told Newsweek on Friday.

"They make mistakes by arming tribes sometimes, and this is dangerous because this will create new militias," he said.

Maliki also appeared to reject criticism of his government's performance in meeting three key political benchmarks aimed at promoting national reconciliation between majority Shi'ites and Sunni Arabs, who were dominant under Saddam Hussein and who now form the backbone of Iraq's bloody insurgency.

more:http://wap.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/COL751037.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dammit, then stop arming them!!
:banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pheasant Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Everything in war is a gamble
If they ask for arms to defend themselves and we turn them down then what will some say when Al Queda murders these tribes for even daring to ask for weapons to turn on them and take their country back without depending on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're missing the history of these tribes, they work similar to Afghanistan. They will work for the
highest bidder and they always have. We dump money and arms on them, then the warlord decides that he got all he can from the US, then moves on to Al-Qaeda and says, "Ok, we're open to what you have to offer". Rinse, lather, and repeat.

A lot of what's going on in Iraq is tribes trying to fill the power vacuum in their respective tribal areas, so the leader doesn't have allegiance to anyone other than their own power. They will take arms and money from anyone and then use them to cement their own control over a region. This means that they will not submit to a central gov't like we are pushing on Iraq. We are helping to put guns in the hands of criminals who only care about themselves and ultimately will use our guns and money to undermine anything we tried to do in Iraq. They will not help us to fight Al-Qaeda unless Al-Qaeda tries to take away control of that warlord's region.

Remember, we entrusted local warlord's at Tora Bora, we threw money at them and you see how that worked out. They escorted OBL into Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What's missing in this narrative is the fact that "al Qaeda in Iraq" isn't "al Qaeda" or even...
...a significant percentage of the insurgency.

This means we are directly arming the Sunni insurgency, which is certainly not lost on the Shi'a. This suggests to me that we're siding with Saudi Arabia in a nascent proxy war against Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. WHAT? And forego all that $$$??? NO CHANCE.
Here's the plan. Arm EVERYBODY, run as many false flags as you can to exacerbate the internal conflicts, enhance every possibility of fratricide that presents itself, call anyone with a gun "Al Kidja," STARVE, SICKEN AND BRUTALIZE the civilian population and PRESTO! INSTANT DEPOPULATION!!!

Makes it easier to keep pumping out that unmetered oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC