|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
youngdem
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 06:48 AM Original message |
Ex-wife becomes a man; ex-husband seeks end to alimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. He does have a point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Men also receive alimony so he doesn't have a point. They are ex-s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. What point is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Men do occasionally receive alimony too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Where did Julio get the money for the operation? Roach is paying over $1000 a month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
all.of.me
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
5. this has probably tweaked the husband's ego more than his pocket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. ohh yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
34. Ding, ding, ding! Exactamundo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. Alimony is a recognition that one partner gave up time and effort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crayson
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Perfect definition of alimony ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerBeppo
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. you mean that financial choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
85. Oh, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ends_dont_justify
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 01:59 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Exactly. Scumbags are scumbags no matter what gender or race N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Ad hominem much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
7. Alimony is not predicated on gender (sex, really) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
9. I Wonder What Was the Listed Cause of the Divorce? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Maybe Julio never should have married in the first place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I was wondering about that, but who gets married assuming that they will get divorced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. But SOCIETY...forces marriage and people try to fit in. Why do you think there are closets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Certainly Julio & Roach Are From a Less Open Generation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Considering When He Was Born |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
57. Orientation, not preference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
10. Welcome to the Patriarchy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Wow, nice ad hominem attacks on the husband. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. It's not his body. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Cynically, I would guess it has zero to do with the operation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Centered
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. I'd call you right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerBeppo
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. after the divorce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. sorry, was using "their money" to mean the ex's money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Sure. The reason is money. He doesn't want to have to pay someone else's expenses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. He doesn't want to honor the agreement he signed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Not wanting to pay your ex-wife does not a homophobe make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Where did I say ANYTHING about being a homophobe???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
63. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dutch
![]() |
Sun Apr-01-07 08:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
94. No, but it's his money- and he specifically said he had no problem with her having the sex change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I know...right? Buhwawawa! Other than being mad his wife is a man and him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanWithAngel
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. no, it's not obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #32 |
74. "he should not be paying any money to anyone now " Why NOT, pray tell? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanWithAngel
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. tell me why he IS and HAS been paying money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. I asked you first, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Accusing someone of being a homophobe and being "threatened" is not an attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. What ad hominem attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Accusing him of being a homophobe and having such low self esteem as to be "threatened." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Actually, it seems pretty obvious that he's prejudiced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Not even close -- There is no evidence. Just one poster's unjustified ad hominem attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. You don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
71. He is going to court over alimony payments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. And he's using her transgendered status to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sun Apr-01-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #71 |
95. does anyone here know this guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 05:48 AM Response to Reply #47 |
70. The evidence is right in the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
93. Which husband... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Looks like Julio wants to join the patriarchy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #10 |
86. 'scuze me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
22. What a dicksmack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Deleted message |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
25. The things we don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Hi UncleSepp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #35 |
52. Hi Crisco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
62. I Did Consider the Social Aspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
80. Florida doesn't recognize gender change w.r.t. marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sun Apr-01-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
96. Well said.. thank you for posting that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwlauren35
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
26. This is why I hate Alimony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerBeppo
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. agreed 100% -nt- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
42. It's not "paying" them, so much as "compensating" them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwlauren35
![]() |
Thu Mar-29-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
72. That's only one case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 02:14 AM Response to Reply #42 |
88. Is working and earning money the most imprtant than in a family? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
40. This sets a new standard for "married the wrong person" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. That's not what alimony is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Earnings power and needs can both contribute to calculating alimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. I think you have Excellent Points. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Discrimination against transgendered people makes up for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. That may be true - Financial disability is a factor as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. i agree w. unclesepp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #64 |
81. Thanks :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sun Apr-01-07 09:25 AM Response to Reply #40 |
97. non sequitur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
54. "that person" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. *nodnod* Some good wishes those are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
55. Julio should lose just for his terrible-fanfic last name! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. I didn't notice that the first reading! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. oh c'mon, it's hella better than julia ROACH!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncteechur
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
59. I would not pay another dime in alimony. The original husband is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Really? So now straights want to cash in on both sides of discrimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
66. Simple!! The ex-husband should cut off his woo-hoo and then "she" could sue "he" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. It is not always women who receive alimony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Sorry you didn't see the pun intended. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. I don't see a pun at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #69 |
78. Nah! You just assumed a very literal interpretation that was not intended. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
77. I think Julio's economic situation must have improved a great deal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. It costs about what a used car costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
79. What does gender identity have to do with alimony? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #79 |
89. hell if I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sun Apr-01-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #79 |
98. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
83. I'm a woman and I think alimony is a really sexist concept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Mar-30-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Strong supporter of ERA here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #83 |
92. Think about the older women who've given up any possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement
![]() |
Sat Mar-31-07 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
90. Sorry, I can't help having a "Duh, It's Florida" moment here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC